1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08007.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Single‐Fiber Pullout Test Using Raman Spectroscopy: Part III, Pullout of Nicalon Fibers from a Pyrex Matrix

Abstract: Single‐fiber pullout specimens consisting of Nicalon fibers and a Pyrex‐glass matrix were fabricated using a specially designed, simple mold. Raman spectroscopy was used to map the distribution of fiber strain within the glass matrix following deformation of the fiber section in air, and the results were compared with those predicted by theoretical analyses. It was demonstrated that the behavior also could be modeled using a partial debonding theory and that the force balance equilibrium allowed the variation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…on stress [454,456e459,465,468,469]. The results fulfil relatively well the predictions of micromechanical models such as Cox's (axial stress for elastic fibre and matrix, the so-called ''shearlag'' model) [413,415], Piggott's (applies after fibre/matrix decohesion and for matrix creeping) [413,417,465,473], the friction model of Kelly and Tyson [415,459,473] or that of Cook and Gordon (stress concentration in the vicinity of cracks) [465].…”
Section: In-situ Micro-raman Extensometry Of Ceramic Fibre-reinforcedsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…on stress [454,456e459,465,468,469]. The results fulfil relatively well the predictions of micromechanical models such as Cox's (axial stress for elastic fibre and matrix, the so-called ''shearlag'' model) [413,415], Piggott's (applies after fibre/matrix decohesion and for matrix creeping) [413,417,465,473], the friction model of Kelly and Tyson [415,459,473] or that of Cook and Gordon (stress concentration in the vicinity of cracks) [465].…”
Section: In-situ Micro-raman Extensometry Of Ceramic Fibre-reinforcedsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Given the much higher Young's modulus of such matrices with respect to resins, Ineffective Lengths (ILs) are small enough (a few micrometers only instead of hundreds [458]) for a cross-section analysis to give results close to those obtained with longitudinal probing [90,389,392,474,475]. Yang and Young [473,476,477] studied 3 f (l) in model single fibre NLM/pyrex and NLM/SiC [478] composites. Bollet et al [479] measured the influence of micro-cracking in SiC/glasseceramic composites.…”
Section: In-situ Micro-raman Extensometry Of Ceramic Fibre-reinforcedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raman spectroscopy micron scale resolution makes it possible to assess the so called ªenvironment effectº on stress in composites (fibre volume fraction and/or neighbouring damaged fibre, [38±42] cracks/holes, [44] sizing [45] or water absorption). [46] Experimental results are in reasonable agreement with the micro-mechanical models of Cox (the so-called ªshear-lagº model measuring axial stress in the elastic domain), [2,12] Piggott (after fibre/matrix debonding), [45,47,48] Kelly-Tyson (friction) [35,45,48] or Cook and Gordon (stress around a crack). [44] The ability of measuring the strain profile along a fibre adjacent to a broken one inside a composite gives a direct measure of the stress concentration factor for the intact fibre.…”
Section: Organic Matrix Compositessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…[42] The cross section analysis then gives a result close to the ªlongitudinalº one. [13] Model ªsingle fibreº NLM TM /Pyrex TM , [48,54,55] NLM TM /SiC, [56] SiC Tyranno TM /glassy matrix, [57] C/C, [58] C Graphil TM /mullite, NLM TM /mullite [13] or Hi-Nicalon TM /mullite, [53] Hi TM (BN/SiC)/celsian and SCS-6 Textron TM /Ti6242 [52] composites were studied.…”
Section: How To Overcome Some Limitations Of the Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If so, S should eventually be proportional to [50] and others [11,36,39,40,[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64] ), as a function of E -1/2 .…”
Section: Young's Modulus and "Raman Microextensometry"mentioning
confidence: 99%