1997
DOI: 10.1017/s0263034600011149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the retrograde hydrogen boron fusion gains at inertial confinement fusion with volume ignition

Abstract: The very clean nuclear fusion reaction of hydrogen and boron-11 by inertial confinement arrives at conditions for power stations by volume ignition only at compressions to 100,000 times the solid state. The earlier (numerically) observed anomaly of decreasing gain at increasing density (retrograde behavior) is analyzed and the reason clarified: the strong stopping power mechanism, based on Gabor's collective model, is reaching its limit of too small Debye lengths at the extremely high densities because of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9)) is ideal for high-efficient direct conversion into electricity with minimum heat pollution or after redirecting of the alphas with magnetic fields for space propulsion. However, it was evident from the beginning that this fusion reaction is very much more difficult than using DT fusion fuel, as seen from the spherical laser compression of p-11 B needing densities of 100,000 times the solid state (Hora, 2002) and input laser pulses of several 10MJ energy to produce modest energy gains per laser energy of less than 25 (Scheffel et al, 1997). However, it was evident from the beginning that this fusion reaction is very much more difficult than using DT fusion fuel, as seen from the spherical laser compression of p-11 B needing densities of 100,000 times the solid state (Hora, 2002) and input laser pulses of several 10MJ energy to produce modest energy gains per laser energy of less than 25 (Scheffel et al, 1997).…”
Section: Fusion Energy Without Dangerous Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9)) is ideal for high-efficient direct conversion into electricity with minimum heat pollution or after redirecting of the alphas with magnetic fields for space propulsion. However, it was evident from the beginning that this fusion reaction is very much more difficult than using DT fusion fuel, as seen from the spherical laser compression of p-11 B needing densities of 100,000 times the solid state (Hora, 2002) and input laser pulses of several 10MJ energy to produce modest energy gains per laser energy of less than 25 (Scheffel et al, 1997). However, it was evident from the beginning that this fusion reaction is very much more difficult than using DT fusion fuel, as seen from the spherical laser compression of p-11 B needing densities of 100,000 times the solid state (Hora, 2002) and input laser pulses of several 10MJ energy to produce modest energy gains per laser energy of less than 25 (Scheffel et al, 1997).…”
Section: Fusion Energy Without Dangerous Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 and Eq. For the volume ignition case, neglecting the Compton process may result in lower fusion gains (Scheffel et al, 1997) only as a lower, pessimistic level of gains. The problem of re-absorption for spherical compression with thermal volume ignition is well including whether the bremsstrahlung is re-absorbed by collisions or additionally by Compton scattering (Meyerhofer et al, 2008).…”
Section: Fusion Energy Without Dangerous Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the bremsstrahlung losses, the electron temperature T e must be much lower than the ion temperature T i , but not too low because the fusion byproducts should be preferentially stopped by the ions [3,5]. In view of this consideration, the electron temperature must be in narrow range around 100 keV to retain the possibility of self-burning [3,[5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example the initial needed energy for volume ignition of DT fuel pellet with initial compression to 10 4 times the solid state and initial volume of 10 À2 cm 3 with a gain of more than 4000 is only 1.882 GJ [2], while for a 3 He 3 He fuel pellet with the same initial condition a gain of about 0.52 needs an initial beam energy of more than 5000 GJ. Comparison of our 3 He 3 He results with the H 11 B [7,16] shows that at a higher input energy, ignition temperature and fusion gain are nearly the same for both fuels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%