2021
DOI: 10.1007/s43441-021-00296-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Real-Time Oncology Review (RTOR) Pilot Program for Approvals of New Molecular Entities

Abstract: The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE) established the Real-Time Oncology Review (RTOR) pilot program in 2017 to streamline the review process for oncology drug applications with the applicant and the Agency agreeing upon a piecemeal strategy and timeline for module components. The Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) review clock does not officially start until the final component is submitted. Participation requires careful planning of time and resources du… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) launched the Real-Time Oncology Review (RTOR) program in 2018 to support earlier review of oncology therapeutics expected to be a substantial improvement over available therapy based on straightforward study designs and easily interpreted end points. 1 Although RTOR applications have been associated with shorter median approval times, 2 , 3 little is known about the evidence supporting RTOR indication approvals. Accordingly, we examined FDA indication approvals that underwent RTOR; characterized their supporting evidence; and established, when applicable, whether postmarketing studies were required to confirm clinical effectiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) launched the Real-Time Oncology Review (RTOR) program in 2018 to support earlier review of oncology therapeutics expected to be a substantial improvement over available therapy based on straightforward study designs and easily interpreted end points. 1 Although RTOR applications have been associated with shorter median approval times, 2 , 3 little is known about the evidence supporting RTOR indication approvals. Accordingly, we examined FDA indication approvals that underwent RTOR; characterized their supporting evidence; and established, when applicable, whether postmarketing studies were required to confirm clinical effectiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%