1953
DOI: 10.1161/01.res.1.5.428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Radiocardiogram in Heart Failure

Abstract: A scintillation counter permits the use of very low doses of I 131 -albumin in the recording of radiocardiograms. In the presence of mild heart failure there is a distinct widening of the interval between the humps derived from the right and left heart. Application of the principle of three-compartment serial dilution suggests that this prolongation may be due in large part to reduced cardiac output; however, cardiac dilatation may contribute significantly. Although radiocardiographic t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

1959
1959
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hakkila and Pietilk (8) and Eich, Chaffee, and Chodos (10) found values for the peak-to-peak time similar to those reported by Shipley, Clark, Liebowitz, and Krohmer (30), which are approximately 30%v higher than the PMTT of 4.6 seconds found in the present series. As Eich and associates point out, the volume measured on the basis of the peak-to-peak time includes blood contained in both sides of the heart.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Hakkila and Pietilk (8) and Eich, Chaffee, and Chodos (10) found values for the peak-to-peak time similar to those reported by Shipley, Clark, Liebowitz, and Krohmer (30), which are approximately 30%v higher than the PMTT of 4.6 seconds found in the present series. As Eich and associates point out, the volume measured on the basis of the peak-to-peak time includes blood contained in both sides of the heart.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The standard deviation of a single determination by any of these methods was estimated to be ± 0.25 L./min./M. 2 As shown in table 2, duplicate precordial determinations did not differ any more than expected on the basis of the precision of the methods. The estimated standard deviation between duplicate determinations was ± 0.25 L./min./M.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…2 (standard error of the difference 0.08 based on the differences between the two methods in each instance). In 25 instances in which all the parameters could be compared, the mean values were 2.97, 2.91, and 3.01 L./min./M.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations