2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04187-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the probability matrix model for the seismic damage vulnerability of empirical structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretically, the CDB behavior approaches to be flexural with a smaller a/h ratio, and its shear strength capacity increased linearly with a/h reduction [19]. The smaller a/h ratio shows minimum deformation capacity of CDB also ductility and beam load capacity [20,21]. This fact was also noticed in the dynamic analysis of the rubcrete beams.…”
Section: 1 A/h Ratio Influencesupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theoretically, the CDB behavior approaches to be flexural with a smaller a/h ratio, and its shear strength capacity increased linearly with a/h reduction [19]. The smaller a/h ratio shows minimum deformation capacity of CDB also ductility and beam load capacity [20,21]. This fact was also noticed in the dynamic analysis of the rubcrete beams.…”
Section: 1 A/h Ratio Influencesupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Generally, the response of continuous concrete deep beams has not investigated by the past researches especially for rubcrete mixes while it can be found some researches about an empirical equations to solve the seismic loads [18][19][20][21]. Numerical solutions by different software programs is interested with the reinforced concrete beams [22].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering structural displacement, energy dissipation, structural modal, stiffness and site factors, 0-1 is used as a quantitative index to express the degree of structural damage. Among them, 0 represents no damage or failure, and 1 represents complete damage or failure [14]. In reference [15], the seismic damage index interval is split into [1,7], which represents the seismic damage of structures in multiple intensity regions.…”
Section: Seismic Damage Index Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table 7, represents the ratio of the number of damages in the th seismic damage grade to the total number of samples for a certain type of structure in a specific intensity region. According to the MSDI model and the vulnerability matrix established by the empirical seismic damage investigation, the matrix model of formula ( 13) is analysed and the MSDI matrix model is obtained, as shown in formula (14)(15)(16) where is the quantity damage ratio of RC frame structure in the state of damage grade , when the seismic intensity (SI)= .…”
Section: Seismic Damage Index Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preciado et al (2020) provides different seismic damage scenarios by associating building vulnerability levels and expected seismic damage levels with seismic intensity. Li et al (2020) based on the seismic damage data to establish the empirical seismic damage probability matrix, the average susceptibility seismic index probability matrix model considering the probability of empirical earthquake vulnerability in multi-seismic areas is proposed. Gautam et al (2016) studied a detailed field survey of Nepal's major world earthquake paradigm and historical earthquakes, as well as the Gurkha earthquake, is fully considered, explaining the lessons Nepal will learn from the Gurkha earthquake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%