2019
DOI: 10.1088/0253-6102/71/6/685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Possible DD¯s0*(2317) and D*D¯s1*(2460) Molecules with QCD Sum Rules*

Abstract: In this article, we assume that there exist the pseudoscalar D D ¯ s 0 … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different from the DDK bound state, these two exotic states are more likely to be discovered at the current facilities because of their hidden charm nature. It is interesting to note that a recent study in QCD sum rules does not find a DD * s0 (2317) bound state [55], consistent with the current picture that the K c (4180) state is a three-body molecule. As a result, we strongly encourage our experimental colleagues to search for it.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Different from the DDK bound state, these two exotic states are more likely to be discovered at the current facilities because of their hidden charm nature. It is interesting to note that a recent study in QCD sum rules does not find a DD * s0 (2317) bound state [55], consistent with the current picture that the K c (4180) state is a three-body molecule. As a result, we strongly encourage our experimental colleagues to search for it.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…The QCD sum rules is a successful method in studying the hadronic properties [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. It could be used to calculate the masses of hadrons, decay constants, hadronic form-factors, coupling constants, etc [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be used to calculate the masses of hadrons, decay constants, hadronic form-factors, coupling constants, etc [26,27]. This method has been applied extensively to study the hidden-charm (bottom) tetraquark (molecular) states [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][28][29][30] and pentaquark (molecular) states [31,32]. In this paper, we construct four six-quark local interpolating currents to study both the Λ c Λ c dibaryon and Λ c Λc baryonium states with the J P = 0 + , 0 − , 1 + and 1 − , respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we choose the local current operators, it is better to refer the corresponding tetraquark states as the3 c 3 c -type, 6 c6c -type, 1 c 1 c -type and 8 c 8 c -type tetraquark states, respectively. In carrying out the operator product expansion, we usually truncate the vacuum condensates up to dimension 6 [4,5,24,25,26], 8 [3,6,7,8,9,10,27,28,29,30,31,39], or 10 [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,32,33,34,35,36,37,40]. Although the convergence of the operator product expansion requires that the contributions of the vacuum condensates of dimension 10, which are of the highest dimension, play a tiny important role in the Borel windows, the highest vacuum condensates are companied with the factors 1 T 2 , 1 T 4 , 1 T 6 , or 1 T 8 , and play an important role in determining the Borel windows so as to extract the reliable tetraquark (molecule) masses, we should take them into account in a consistent way, where the T 2 is the Borel parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%