1982
DOI: 10.3758/bf03206228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the perception of motion concomitant with a lateral motion of the head

Abstract: This study is concerned with two questions regarding the illusory motion of objects that occurs concomitantly with motion of the head. One is whether this illusory concomitant motion, unlike the perception of real motion, is paradoxical in the sense that, although the object appears to move, it does not appear to go anywhere. The second question is whether illusory concomitant motion can be explained by errors in convergence produced by a tendency for the convergence of the eyes to displace in the direction of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
1

Year Published

1983
1983
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though Gogel (1982) has shown that vergence changes occurring as a function of viewers' lateral position are too small to account for illusory concomitant motion, such slight changes in vergence may contribute to viewers' ability to hold one depth organization of a reversible display. Suppose, for example, that divergence occurring at one lateral (or vertical) extreme favored the fusion of the back organization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though Gogel (1982) has shown that vergence changes occurring as a function of viewers' lateral position are too small to account for illusory concomitant motion, such slight changes in vergence may contribute to viewers' ability to hold one depth organization of a reversible display. Suppose, for example, that divergence occurring at one lateral (or vertical) extreme favored the fusion of the back organization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view linking perceived motion to perceived depth has been outlined and supported in numerous papers by Cogel and colleagues (Gogel and Tietz, 1973;Gogel. 1980Gogel. , 1982.…”
Section: (6) Motion As Required Far Pattern Cisianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of triangulation is the use of binocular convergence in the perception of distance; sensing of the vergences of the two eyes, both fixated on a near target, is used by the visual system to estimate the target's egocentric distance (Foley, 1980). Gogel (1974Gogel ( , 1982 was probably the first to develop a triangulation method for measuring perceived egocentric distance (see also Gogel, 1990Gogel, , 1993Gogel, Loomis, Newman, & Sharkey, 1985). His method, depicted in Figure lB, involves movement of the observer's head and the observer's judgment of any apparent movement of the target that there might be.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%