Analysis of the p-T Interaction above the T(p, n)He3 Reaction Threshold

Balashko, Yu.G.; Barit, I.Ya.

doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2657-9_3

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It must also be noted that in the case of plastic pollution on the high seas, states that are not directly injured may not be entitled to demand compensation as obtaining compensation without any loss or damage would amount to a type of undue profit. 120…”

Section: Challenges To Invoking Shared State Responsibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Yet reparation, including compensation, is essentially a past-oriented concept; it may not be suitable for protecting the well-being of future generations from environmental damage. 123 In the light of this, ex post facto responsibility, independent or shared, contains an inherent limitation in the protection of the marine environment. Thus far, there has not been a case on this subject at the international level.…”

Section: Limitations Of Communitarian Normsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Shared State Responsibility for Land-Based Marine Plastic Pollution

Tanaka

2023

TEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Plastic litter is introduced into the oceans from land-based sources located in many countries around the world. Marine plastic pollution may therefore be attributable to multiple states, resulting in shared state responsibility. This article discusses the issue of shared state responsibility for land-based marine plastic pollution by examining (i) primary rules of international law concerning the prevention of land-based marine plastic pollution; (ii) secondary rules of international law on this subject; and (iii) possible ways of strengthening the primary rules. It concludes that the barrier for the invocation of state responsibility may become higher in cases of shared state responsibility. Three cumulative solutions to this problem are proposed: elaborating the obligation of due diligence, strengthening compliance procedures, and interlinking regimes governing the marine environment and international watercourses.

show abstract

Section: Challenges To Invoking Shared State Responsibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Limitations Of Communitarian Normsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shared State Responsibility for Land-Based Marine Plastic Pollution

Tanaka

2023

TEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…106 In an era where politics and politicians are unrelentingly disparaged, it comes as no surprise that Lord Hailsham's characterisation of the UK constitutional system as an 'elective dictatorship' continues to resonate with the public. 107 Contemporary authors have not been afraid to lambaste the current system as 'in turmoil', 108 'unprotected', 109 and especially in reference to Brexit, as 'in crisis'. 110 Some writers also seem surprised that an unwritten flexible constitution produces constitutional change, as if the UK were in continuous constitutional tumult.…”

Section: Out Of Step: the Uk Contextualisedmentioning

confidence: 99%

What is constitutional idolatry?

Jones¹

2020

Constitutional Idolatry and Democracy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

At the 2016 Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, Khizr Kahn-an American Muslim and father of an American soldier killed in Iraq-rhetorically asked Donald Trump regarding his proposed Muslim ban whether he had 'even read the United States Constitution?' 2 Kahn then produced a small paperback edition of the document from his jacket pocket, saying, 'I will gladly lend you my copy'. 3 The crowd erupted. It was a powerful moment, and certainly one of the highlights of the four-day event, occurring in one of the most contentious US presidential elections in recent memory. After this, the US Constitution itself had a 'moment'. Sales of the written document spiked to record levels, with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the Government Printing Office, and niche publishers offering discounted rates on their versions of the document. On Amazon the pocket version of the US Constitution blazed up to #2 on the best-sellers list (only behind the latest Harry Potter book), 4 and for a spell demonstrators at Trump's rallies could be seen waving the document at him in protest, taunting him and his supporters with the sacred text. 5 The message was clear: Trump was not only a threat, but an unconstitutional threat that endangered America's most sacred values and principles.Thus, when Donald Trump lost the national popular vote by close to three million ballots, and yet the Constitution via the Electoral College secured him the presidency anyway, momentum from the increased constitutional attention-not to mention the increased readership-could have brought forward a fortuitous constitutional moment. At a time of historic national polarisation and cultural division, some type of constitutional rejuvenation 1

show abstract

“…100 As Bland has explained, the Ilford case was used by the press to criticise modern women for their regular attendance in the public gallery: 'if they were so obsessed with seeking sensation, how could they judge impartially?' 101 Studholme's comments were only hypothetical, however, and were not informed by any actual experience of serving on a homicide trial. Those who did serve on murder trials frequently found the experience difficult to forget.…”

Section: Were Women Routinely Removed From Certain Types Of Trial?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Keeping women off the jury in 1920s England and Wales

Crosby¹

2017

Legal stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act 1919 ended the prohibition on female jurors. This did not mean that English and Welsh juries became representative institutions overnight, however: the property qualifications ensured that juries were still drawn from the top few per cent of the local population; and the 1919 Act expressly permitted trial judges to order single‐sex juries where the nature of the evidence required it. The continued existence of peremptory challenges allowed defendants in felony trials to exclude women from their juries whenever they preferred to be tried only by men. Finally, some judges permitted female jurors to excuse themselves from particular trials if they so desired. This paper explores the effects these factors had on the practical enjoyment of the female jury franchise after the passing of the 1919 Act. It finds that the picture is remarkably localised: rates of women serving on juries were very different for the five assize circuits for which adequate records exist (Midland, Oxford, South Eastern, South Wales and Western). By exploring these issues, this paper reveals how flexible the female jury franchise was in its early years, and shows how important local differences were in keeping women off the jury.

show abstract

Analysis of the p-T Interaction above the T(p, n)He3 Reaction Threshold

Cited by 5 publications

References 11 publications

Shared State Responsibility for Land-Based Marine Plastic Pollution

Shared State Responsibility for Land-Based Marine Plastic Pollution

What is constitutional idolatry?

Keeping women off the jury in 1920s England and Wales

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About