2004
DOI: 10.1667/rr3258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Mortality Experience amongst U.S. Nuclear Power Industry Workers after Chronic Low-Dose Exposure to Ionizing Radiation

Abstract: Workers employed in 15 utilities that generate nuclear power in the United States have been followed for up to 18 years between 1979 and 1997. Their cumulative dose from whole body ionizing radiation has been determined from the dose records maintained by the facilities themselves and the REIRS and REMS systems maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Department of Energy, respectively. Mortality in the cohort from a number of causes has been analyzed with respect to individual radiation doses. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
65
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…36 However, a similar increase in brain cancer risk was not demonstrated in the combined analysis of mortality among nuclear workers of the 3 countries 37 nor in recent studies of the nuclear workforce in Canada 38 and the nuclear industry in the United States. 39 The excess of brain cancer cases in our study was of borderline significance, and it might be a chance finding due to multiple comparisons or close surveillance. 40 It also is possible that some of the brain cancers of ill-defined histology were metastatic from other primary sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…36 However, a similar increase in brain cancer risk was not demonstrated in the combined analysis of mortality among nuclear workers of the 3 countries 37 nor in recent studies of the nuclear workforce in Canada 38 and the nuclear industry in the United States. 39 The excess of brain cancer cases in our study was of borderline significance, and it might be a chance finding due to multiple comparisons or close surveillance. 40 It also is possible that some of the brain cancers of ill-defined histology were metastatic from other primary sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Data are available from cohort studies of Japanese atomic bomb survivors (reviewed in ref. 21), nuclear plant (and other nuclear industries) workers (22)(23)(24), and Chernobyl's accident operation (''clean-up'') workers (21). These data provide estimates for the leukemia risk (per unit of dose) induced in three very different DR regions, calculated here as percent increase of background risk per 10 cSv (Fig.…”
Section: Relative Risk Of Leukemogenesis Over a Wide Range Of Drsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Career radiation limits and shielding requirements could also be impacted by new knowledge of fatal non-cancer risks from radiation exposure such as heart disease (Preston et al, 2003;Howe et al, 2004;Yang et al, 1982) or damage to the central nervous system (CNS).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of heart disease for ions is largely unknown because only one report (considered a pilot study by the authors of the report) has been made on the effects of HZE ions on heart disease (Yang et al, 1982), and human data for low LET radiation at low dose-rates is inconclusive on the level of risk to be expected (Howe et al, 2004;Cardis et al, 1995). CNS risks have the potential to impact both short-term and career radiation limits and mitigation approaches (NRC, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation