2019
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/668/1/012017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the mechanical properties of Q345R steel in deep-regulating units by the spherical indentation method

Abstract: The principles of testing the mechanical properties of metallic materials through the use of the spherical indentation test have been analysed and studied in this paper. The error between the representative indentation stress from spherical indentation and the theoretical stress of the power exponential equation was taken as the convergence condition using the optimization function in Matlab. The yield strength, strain hardening index and elastic modulus were optimized between the stress-strain curve from sphe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the unloading section, the simulation curve was steeper than the experimental curve, which reflected that the elastic modulus calculated by simulation was slightly smaller than the value measured by experiment. The hardening exponent was close to the result of Sun et al (n = 0.142) (2019) [4] and the yield stress was larger than their research result (σ y = 381 MPa), which was basically consistent with the results obtained by Li et al (2020) [59] by cyclic loading indentation test with a spherical indenter (R = 500 µm, σ y = 424 MPa) and slightly larger than the yield stress obtained by the compression test (σ y = 392 MPa). From the comparations of the stress-strain curve in Figure 12b, it shows that the stress-strain curve of tensile experiment was lower than that of the indentation experiment in the study of Sun et al (2019), and the stress-strain curve obtained in this study was higher than both of them [4].…”
Section: Comparations and Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, in the unloading section, the simulation curve was steeper than the experimental curve, which reflected that the elastic modulus calculated by simulation was slightly smaller than the value measured by experiment. The hardening exponent was close to the result of Sun et al (n = 0.142) (2019) [4] and the yield stress was larger than their research result (σ y = 381 MPa), which was basically consistent with the results obtained by Li et al (2020) [59] by cyclic loading indentation test with a spherical indenter (R = 500 µm, σ y = 424 MPa) and slightly larger than the yield stress obtained by the compression test (σ y = 392 MPa). From the comparations of the stress-strain curve in Figure 12b, it shows that the stress-strain curve of tensile experiment was lower than that of the indentation experiment in the study of Sun et al (2019), and the stress-strain curve obtained in this study was higher than both of them [4].…”
Section: Comparations and Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Characterization of the elastic–plastic properties of materials is of great significance for the structural design and engineering evaluation. Due to the incomparable advantages in the measurement of nondestructive and micro-mechanical properties [ 1 , 2 ], nanoindentation technology has been widely used in the research of mechanical properties of metals [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ], films [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], and biomaterials [ 10 , 11 , 12 ], particularly in the elastic–plastic properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The determination of Young's modulus is based on the assumption that during the unloading curve the removal of the tip is accompanied by a spring back due to the elasticity of the material. Thus the slope of the unloading curve provides a measure Young's modulus [57][58][59]. The method is based on the recovery theory of Hertz [60].…”
Section: Reduced Young's Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%