2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.peva.2010.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the M/G/1 queue with discriminatory random order service policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since the service discipline is non-preemptive, non-anticipating and all class-k customers in the queue are stochastically equivalent, the distribution of the queue-length vector does not depend on the particular choice of the intraclass policy. Hence, for any arbitrary work-conserving intra-class policy we have the following result from [14]. …”
Section: Queue Length At Departure Epochsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, since the service discipline is non-preemptive, non-anticipating and all class-k customers in the queue are stochastically equivalent, the distribution of the queue-length vector does not depend on the particular choice of the intraclass policy. Hence, for any arbitrary work-conserving intra-class policy we have the following result from [14]. …”
Section: Queue Length At Departure Epochsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before focusing on the heavy-traffic regime, we will introduce a system of equations that is satisfied by the probability generating function of the queue-length distribution at departure epochs, as obtained by Kim, Kim, and Kim [14]. Define…”
Section: Queue Length At Departure Epochsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We mention, among others, priority scheduling (see, e.g., [4,8,11,13,15]), weighted fair queueing (WFQ) (see, e.g., [14,17]), random order of service (ROS) (see, e.g., [1,3,10]), and generalized processor sharing (GPS) (see, e.g., [9,12,16]). Strangely enough, only few results have been derived for multi-class First-Come-First-Served (FCFS) systems, i.e., queueing systems in which the customers of different classes are accommodated in one queue and served in their order of arrival, irrespective of the classes they belong to (a recent paper is [5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%