2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10061860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Land Use and Cover Changes in the Metropolitan Area of Tepic-Xalisco (1973–2015) through Landsat Images

Abstract: Land use and cover changes (LUCC) have been identified as one of the main causes of biodiversity loss and deforestation in the world. Fundamentally, the urban land use has replaced agricultural and forest cover causing loss of environmental services. Monitoring and quantifying LUCC are essential to achieve a proper land management. The objective of this study was to analyze the LUCC in the metropolitan area of Tepic-Xalisco during the period 1973-2015. To find the best fit and obtain the different land use cla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…LULC change detection was carried out by a post-classification comparison of bi-temporal maps. This is perhaps the most common approach for change detection [35] and has been successfully used by many studies, such as [1,19,[36][37][38][39][40][41]. The cross-tabulation matrix for the LULC changes for the first period (1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007), the second period (2007-2018) and the overall period (1994-2018) were generated.…”
Section: Land Use/land Cover Change Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LULC change detection was carried out by a post-classification comparison of bi-temporal maps. This is perhaps the most common approach for change detection [35] and has been successfully used by many studies, such as [1,19,[36][37][38][39][40][41]. The cross-tabulation matrix for the LULC changes for the first period (1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007), the second period (2007-2018) and the overall period (1994-2018) were generated.…”
Section: Land Use/land Cover Change Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we applied transition matrixes of change to identify the main land cover transitions during land cover changes. This is the most conventional method to identify significant transitions between different land covers for a given period (Martínez-Fernández et al 2015), being widely used in several studies (e.g., Mottet et al 2006;Morán-Ordóñez 2012;Avalos-Jiménez et al 2018). In the transition matrix, rows display the classes at an initial time t 1 and columns display the classes at a final time t 2 .…”
Section: Temporal Patterns Of Land Cover Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following procedures were followed in order to answer the study questions: firstly, six Landsat images for the dry seasons (to avoid cloud cover effects) of 1989,1993,2000,2006,2011, and 2015 were downloaded from the United States Geological Survey (USGS, http://glovis.usgs.gov/) at Level 1 T using different paths and rows (167/070, 167/071, 168/070, and 168/071). All images had a spatial resolution of 30 m which is large enough to visualize changes in land use [38] from Landsat 5, 7, and 8. Secondly, meteorological, topographical, and socioeconomic data from 1989 to 2015 were collected from the Malawi Department of Meteorological Services and Statistics [24,36].…”
Section: Data Collection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%