2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the influence of part thickness on the replication of micro-structured surfaces by injection molding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the rapid development of miniaturization and precision products, microinjection molding (MIM) is playing a vital role in the field of optical communication, computer data storage, automotive, aerospace, precision instrument, biomedicine, and engineering applications . Due to small size and volume, the rheological behavior of MIM parts is different from that of conventional injection‐molded parts .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid development of miniaturization and precision products, microinjection molding (MIM) is playing a vital role in the field of optical communication, computer data storage, automotive, aerospace, precision instrument, biomedicine, and engineering applications . Due to small size and volume, the rheological behavior of MIM parts is different from that of conventional injection‐molded parts .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, many research groups have focused their attention on the factors that affect the replication quality during the µIM process, in particular on process conditions and cavity geometry [1]. The results reported in the literature indicate that among the main factors, mould temperature (T m ) markedly affect the replication degree of micro features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on in-flow sections, the H 1 dimensions (▲) are very close to the target values for both depth and width. Basically, proximity to the injection entry supports this result [14]. The H 2 results (▬) are the worst, since both depth and width are very far away from the target values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%