2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2009.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Hubbard ring using counting operators

Abstract: We prove three theorems about the use of a counting operator to study the spectrum of model Hamiltonians. We analytically calculate the eigenvalues of the Hubbard ring with four lattice positions and apply our theorems to describe the observed level crossings.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simplest one is a uniform field in the x-direction follows immediately that M = L z is a generalized symmetry of H, with γ = − . The method of classifying eigenvalues into multiplets, as worked out in [7], works well if a basis of common eigenvectors of H 0 and M is explicitly known. This is only partially the case for the hamiltonian of the hydrogen atom with M = L z since the spectrum of these operators is partly discrete, partly continuous.…”
Section: The Hydrogen Atom In An External Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The simplest one is a uniform field in the x-direction follows immediately that M = L z is a generalized symmetry of H, with γ = − . The method of classifying eigenvalues into multiplets, as worked out in [7], works well if a basis of common eigenvectors of H 0 and M is explicitly known. This is only partially the case for the hamiltonian of the hydrogen atom with M = L z since the spectrum of these operators is partly discrete, partly continuous.…”
Section: The Hydrogen Atom In An External Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This special case has been investigated in [7,8]. In a slightly different context ( 19) is called the Dolan-Grady condition [9].…”
Section: Proof Of the Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations