2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2010.01469.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the HLA population data (AHPD) submitted to the 15th International Histocompatibility/Immunogenetics Workshop by using the Gene[rate] computer tools accommodating ambiguous data (ahpd project report)

Abstract: During the 15th International Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Workshop (IHIWS), 14 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) laboratories participated in the Analysis of HLA Population Data (AHPD) project where 18 new population samples were analyzed statistically and compared with data available from previous workshops. To that aim, an original methodology was developed and used (i) to estimate frequencies by taking into account ambiguous genotypic data, (ii) to test for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) by using a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
62
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
10
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the "Population comparisons" of the paper African, American, and European populations (including Macedonian population) were compared [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the "Population comparisons" of the paper African, American, and European populations (including Macedonian population) were compared [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HLA DNA genotyped results from our laboratory were included in the analysis of the HLA population data (AHPD) submitted to the 15th International Histocompatibility/Immunogenetics Workshop by using the GENE[RATE] computer tools accommodating ambiguous data (AHPD project report) and are published [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method used here is an improvement of the procedure implemented in GENE[RATE] (Nunes 2004(Nunes , 2007Nunes et al 2010), which is an adaptation of the classical EW test to ambiguous data. It consists in estimating the p values of the usual EW test for nonambiguous random samples and in using the distribution of these p values to assess selective neutrality.…”
Section: Testing Selective Neutrality Through a Resampling Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two methods produce different genotyping ambiguities at each locus, and PCR-SSP reveals fewer ambiguities than SSO-Luminex. Allele frequencies were estimated for both methods and each of the three loci by using the GENE[RATE] implementation of the ExpectationMaximization (EM) algorithm (Dempster et al 1977;Nunes 2005), an extension capable of accommodating all kinds of ambiguous data (Nunes 2005(Nunes , 2007Nunes et al 2010). To test the equivalence of the two estimations, we developed an original resampling procedure to compare the values of the frequency estimates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%