2008
DOI: 10.1117/1.3036181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the H.264 advanced video coding standard and an associated rate control scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We empirically observed in [4] that while coding head-andshoulder type video sequences at low bit rate, more than 70% of the MBs were never partitioned into smaller blocks by the H.264 that would otherwise be at a high bit-rate. In [5], it has been further demonstrated that the partitioning actually depends upon the extent of motion and quantization parameter (QP): for low motion video, 67% (with low QP) to 85% (with high QP) of MBs are not further partitioned; for high motion video, the range is 26-64. It can be easily observed that the possibility of choosing smaller block sizes diminishes as the target bit-rate is lowered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We empirically observed in [4] that while coding head-andshoulder type video sequences at low bit rate, more than 70% of the MBs were never partitioned into smaller blocks by the H.264 that would otherwise be at a high bit-rate. In [5], it has been further demonstrated that the partitioning actually depends upon the extent of motion and quantization parameter (QP): for low motion video, 67% (with low QP) to 85% (with high QP) of MBs are not further partitioned; for high motion video, the range is 26-64. It can be easily observed that the possibility of choosing smaller block sizes diminishes as the target bit-rate is lowered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%