1974
DOI: 10.1128/jb.118.1.242-249.1974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Growth of Recombination-Deficient Strains of Escherichia coli K-12

Abstract: Cultures of' recombination-deficient strains of Escherichia coli are composed of' three classes of cells: (i) viable cells, which can undergo 20 or more generations, (ii) residually dividing cells, which can undergo fewer than 20 generations (probably an average of' f'ewer than 6). and (iii) nondividing cells, which are incapable of' a single division. The nonviable but residually dividing cells contribute to the mass increase of the culture, but not to the viability, thus accounting for the apparent dissimila… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
30
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(33 reference statements)
6
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This does not seem to be consistent with the general belief that pausing of a replication fork leading to replication arrest is quite frequent during normal chromosome replication (reviewed by Cox et al, 2000;Michel, 2000;Rothstein et al, 2000). The observation that RecA deficiency causes massive chromosome degradation (Skarstad and Boye, 1993) and renders over 50% of the cells non-viable (Capaldo-Kimball and Barbour, 1971;Capaldo et al, 1974;S. Maisnier-Patin et al unpublished observation) supports the frequent occurrence of DSBs from replication arrest and dependence on homologous recombination for reactivation (Cox, 1999;Marians, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This does not seem to be consistent with the general belief that pausing of a replication fork leading to replication arrest is quite frequent during normal chromosome replication (reviewed by Cox et al, 2000;Michel, 2000;Rothstein et al, 2000). The observation that RecA deficiency causes massive chromosome degradation (Skarstad and Boye, 1993) and renders over 50% of the cells non-viable (Capaldo-Kimball and Barbour, 1971;Capaldo et al, 1974;S. Maisnier-Patin et al unpublished observation) supports the frequent occurrence of DSBs from replication arrest and dependence on homologous recombination for reactivation (Cox, 1999;Marians, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The recA mutation leaves about 10% of cells anucleate at each cell division and can generate up to 50% dead cells (Capaldo et al, 1974), yet the majority of the recA strains used here gave fast growth rates and only DH10b and XL10 Gold had slow growth out of the 7 recA strains in Table I.…”
Section: Host Genotype and Selective Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A defect in DNA replication and cell division in recA cells was first reported by Inouye (Inouye 1971). Over 50% of the cells in a culture of a recA null mutant are nonviable under at least some conditions (Capaldo et al 1974). The frequency of productive replication initiation at oriC is significantly reduced (Skarstad & Boye 1988).…”
Section: Quantifying Step 1 Under Normal Growth Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 91%