2017
DOI: 10.21276/aimdr.2018.4.1.or1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Functional Outcome of Limb Length Discrepancy after Total Hip Replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean pre operative OHS in our study was 17.7 which improved to 45.1 postoperatively at final follow up (Table 7). In the study by Kumar et al, 7 pre operative OHS was 6.7 which improved to 41.14 post operatively. We did not find any significant (p>0.05) difference between the post operative OHS of patients of One stage & Two stage surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The mean pre operative OHS in our study was 17.7 which improved to 45.1 postoperatively at final follow up (Table 7). In the study by Kumar et al, 7 pre operative OHS was 6.7 which improved to 41.14 post operatively. We did not find any significant (p>0.05) difference between the post operative OHS of patients of One stage & Two stage surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In contrast, hip pain, limping and patient satisfactions were all significantly associated with leg shortening, whereas walking capacity was not. Sanjay Kumar et al [16] noticed shorter limb length as compared to contra lateral side during the pre-operative period and during post-operative period; the lengthening of limb was identified as 42.9% (9/21) and 19% (4/21) of cases shortening of limb was identified and in 31% (8/21) postoperative limb lengths were equal. Functional scores were excellent in patients with equal limb length as compared to those having shorter or longer limb length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%