2013
DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2012.675109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Frequency and Severity of Rear-End Crashes in Work Zones

Abstract: Major findings related to the frequency of rear-end crashes include the following: (1) work zones for capacity and pavement improvements have the highest frequency compared to other types of work zones; (2) work zones controlled by flaggers are associated with more rear-end crashes compared to those controlled by arrow boards; and (3) work zones with alternating one-way traffic tended to have more rear-end crashes compared to those with lane shifts. Major findings related to the severity of the rear-end crashe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These drivers tend to be more aware of the danger and are better prepared to slow down or take other measures to reduce the crash risk. These findings are consistent with a number of previous researches [31,[38][39][40][41]. However, Zhao and Garber found no major differences between the day and nighttime crashes in the work zone [42].…”
Section: Model Estimation Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These drivers tend to be more aware of the danger and are better prepared to slow down or take other measures to reduce the crash risk. These findings are consistent with a number of previous researches [31,[38][39][40][41]. However, Zhao and Garber found no major differences between the day and nighttime crashes in the work zone [42].…”
Section: Model Estimation Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Hazards in work zones have typically been studied through analyses of historical crash data to identify the factors contributing to the frequency of work zone crashes (Chen and Tarko, 2012;Daniel et al, 2000;Harb et al, 2008;Khattak et al, 2002;Khattak and Targa, 2004;Qi et al, 2013;Venugopal and Tarko, 2000) and their injury severity (Khattak et al, 2002;Khattak and Targa, 2004;Li and Bai, 2008b;Qi et al, 2013). However, the crash data-based approach is often hampered by the lack of detail in official datasets (Chen and Tarko, 2014;Cheng et al, 2012) and the likelihood of under-reporting of work zone crashes (Debnath et al, 2013;Schrock et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the identification of black spots, numerous indicators are available, the most traditional being a crash frequency analysis (used with the simple ranking [SR] method) due to its highly consistent results across consecutive years of crash history (AASHTO, 2010; Qi et al, 2013). However, this indicator can result in segments of road with a low potential benefit being identified as black spots due to the fact that it does not take into account the severity of the crashes it analyzes, unless a severity specific analysis is used (i.e., crash frequency analysis using only major injury and fatal crash data).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%