Analysis of the Features Important for the Effectiveness of Physical Activity–Related Apps for Recreational Sports: Expert Panel Approach

Abstract

BackgroundA large number of people participate in individual or unorganized sports on a recreational level. Furthermore, many participants drop out because of injury or lowered motivation. Potentially, physical activity–related apps could motivate people during sport participation and help them to follow and maintain a healthy active lifestyle. It remains unclear what the quality of running, cycling, and walking apps is and how it can be assessed. Quality of these apps was defined as having a positive influence on participation in recreational sports. This information will show which features need to be assessed when rating physical activity–related app quality.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to identify expert perception on which features are important for the effectiveness of physical activity–related apps for participation in individual, recreational sports.MethodsData were gathered via an expert panel approach using the nominal group technique. Two expert panels were organized to identify and rank app features relevant for sport participation. Experts were researchers or professionals in the field of industrial design and information technology (technology expert panel) and in the field of behavior change, health, and human movement sciences who had affinity with physical activity–related apps (health science expert panel). Of the 24 experts who were approached, 11 (46%) agreed to participate. Each panel session consisted of three consultation rounds. The 10 most important features per expert were collected. We calculated the frequency of the top 10 features and the mean importance score per feature (0-100). The sessions were taped and transcribed verbatim; a thematic analysis was conducted on the qualitative data.ResultsIn the technology expert panel, applied feedback and feedforward (91.3) and fun (91.3) were found most important (scale 0-100). Together with flexibility and look and feel, these features were mentioned most often (all n=4 [number of experts]; importance scores=41.3 and 43.8, respectively). The experts in the health science expert panels a and b found instructional feedback (95.0), motivating or challenging (95.0), peer rating and use (92.0), motivating feedback (91.3), and monitoring or statistics (91.0) most important. Most often ranked features were monitoring or statistics, motivating feedback, works good technically, tailoring starting point, fun, usability anticipating or context awareness, and privacy (all n=3-4 [number of experts]; importance scores=16.7-95.0). The qualitative analysis resulted in four overarching themes: (1) combination behavior change, technical, and design features needed; (2) extended feedback and tailoring is advised; (3) theoretical or evidence base as standard; and (4) entry requirements related to app use.ConclusionsThe results show that a variety of features, including design, technical, and behavior change, are considered important for the effectiveness of physical activity–related apps by experts from different fields of expertise. These insights may ass...

Understanding Different Types of Recreational Runners and How They Use Running-Related Technology

“…Studies have found that running-related technology such as sports watches and apps are widely used, and they get significant attention in research. However, consumer-available running apps and sports watches almost all use the one-size-fits-all principle and take little or no account of a runner's motives, drivers, or AIOs [6,32,63]. These insights suggest a need for a more differentiated approach that targets the distinct needs of specific types of runners [6,28].…”

“…These sports watches and apps have great potential, because they are affordable, accessible, have a large reach, and provide multi-function operation [26][27][28], but the literature shows that this kind of technology is often not used for prolonged times and user commitment is low [29][30][31]. Therefore, it is important to match the user's expectations of technology and close the gap between runners' expectations and actual experience with these devices [6,32,33]. In order to understand the needs of runners effectively and adequately, their attitudes, interests, and opinions (AIOs) should be established and understood.…”

Personality Traits, Gamification and Features to Develop an App to Reduce Physical Inactivity

“…Another 57.5% would like to do more outdoor activities [25]. To achieve the current WHO recommendations and to establish a sustainable level of PA, a willingness to change one's behavior, increased motivation and measures to promote sport and PA are required [23,26].…”

“…However, the emotions of the user are related to the experience and long-term use of an app [43]. As various studies have already shown that gamification can positively influence motivation and behavioral change [26,33,51], negative emotions according to inappropriate gamification elements or app features should be avoided [43]. In addition, behavior patterns also depend on external factors [6].…”

How Do Runners Experience Personalization of Their Training Scheme: The Inspirun E-Coach?

“…In particular, smartphones have several advantages. They are widely used, are embedded in everyday life [6,7], and allow people to collect data anywhere, anytime [8]. Since most people already have a smartphone (up to 76% of adults) [9] and apps are relatively cheap, often even free of charge, apps are accessible for almost everyone.…”