2010
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20100638009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the fatigue strength under two load levels of a stainless steel based on energy dissipation

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper the fatigue behaviour of a stainless steel AISI 304L is analysed. In the first part of the work the results obtained under constant amplitude fatigue are presented and synthesised in terms of both stress amplitude and energy released to the surroundings as heat by a unit volume of material per cycle, Q. Then some specimens have been fatigued in variable amplitude, two different load level tests: the first level was set higher while the second was lower than the constant amplitude fatigu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As visible in Table 2, the numerical study provided relatively good agreement between the calculated Se values with the experimentally determined Se values of some investigated materials (AISI 304 and AA 1050). This observation refers firstly to AISI 304 steel whose numerically determined Se value of 103 MPa is perfectly fitting the span of experimental values (95-111 MPa) that can be found in literature [31][32][33]. A relatively good agreement, however with a slight underestimation, was achieved for the aluminum alloy AA 1050 (8 versus 10-14 MPa [36]).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 72%
“…As visible in Table 2, the numerical study provided relatively good agreement between the calculated Se values with the experimentally determined Se values of some investigated materials (AISI 304 and AA 1050). This observation refers firstly to AISI 304 steel whose numerically determined Se value of 103 MPa is perfectly fitting the span of experimental values (95-111 MPa) that can be found in literature [31][32][33]. A relatively good agreement, however with a slight underestimation, was achieved for the aluminum alloy AA 1050 (8 versus 10-14 MPa [36]).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In order to be able to evaluate these properties, the material response due to the fatigue loading is measured by using different NDT-related techniques. For instance IR-thermography or electrical resistance measurements, are very sensitive tools to measure and evaluate changes in microstructure during the fatigue process, 26,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] whereby the focus in this article is on the use of temperature data. Additionally, values from related change in electrical resistance and plastic strain amplitude are included into the consideration.…”
Section: Midaclife Incrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…,02 p  is the material cyclic proof stress. For the AISI 304L steel material analysed in this paper, =7940 kg/m 3 , c=507 J/(kg·K) [19], ' ,02 p  =290 MPa [9].…”
Section: Comparison Between Experimental and Theoretical Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%