Analysis of the Environmental Sustainability of a Megacity through a Cobenefits Indicator System—The Case of Shanghai

Abstract

<jats:p>Based on the synergistic control of greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution, a co-benefits indicator system was established to evaluate the co-benefits of city policies for megacities with regard to energy conservation and environmental sustainability. Shanghai was chosen as a typical case study, owing to its relatively high level of progress in terms of urbanization and its complex economic, social, and ecological development problems. In this indicator system, 23 indicators were screened, based on the driver-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) framework. Economic, social, and ecological development data for Shanghai from 2005 to 2018 were collected and analyzed using an entropy method. This was followed by the application of a weighted average method to determine the indicator weights and co-benefits index (CBI) for Shanghai. The results yield variations in the weights of the indexes. The weight of the tertiary industry production proportion in the GDP was the highest, owing to the government promotional policies, whereas the weight of the annual average temperature was the smallest, as global warming only becomes significant when the time span is much longer. In such a short time span (i.e., 14years), the change in the annual average temperature is relatively insignificant. The Co-benefit Index also varied over time; it showed a growing trend over the 14 years, increasing from 0.375 in 2005 to 1.365 in 2018, i.e., a 264% increase. This indicates that the efforts taken in Shanghai and their effects were positive, overall. Four suggestions were proposed, based on the results of the analysis: a) control the amount of total energy consumption and change the energy structure to reduce carbon and air pollution emissions; b) adjust the structure of industry, especially by increasing the proportion of tertiary industries; c) increase investments in environmental protection; and d) cooperate with regional partners to limit the occurrence of acid rain. The applicability of this approach and research prospects are also discussed.</jats:p>

A Framework to analyze the Impacts of AI with the Sustainable Development Goals

“…A twofold teacher model involving a teacher and a virtual appearance helper, which can take command over the instructor's standard endeavor, saves educators' time, enabling them to focus in on student bearing and composed correspondence. Teachers have proactively started helping out AI partners for the best outcomes for their understudies [40].…”

Study on the Co-Benefits of Air Pollution Control and Carbon Reduction in the Yellow River Basin: An Assessment Based on a Spatial Econometric Model

“…Considering the differences in the emission levels of carbon and air pollutants and the related policies in time and space, this study comprehensively evaluated the co-benefits of carbon reduction and air pollution control in the YRB by integrating the macro factors of society, economy, and environment. Following the premise of comprehensiveness, objectivity, systematicness, and operability as well as referring to the research work of Qiao et al [45], the evaluation index system was constructed based on the DPSIRM framework, and the weight was determined by the entropy weight method presented in Section 2.1, as shown in Table 1. Combined with the relevant data from the China Statistical Yearbook, China Environmental Statistical Yearbook, and the provincial statistical yearbooks, the comprehensive scores of the co-benefits of carbon reduction and air pollution control in the YRB were obtained after empowerment and differentiation as shown in Table 2.…”

Construction and Evaluation of the Integrated Perception Ecological Environment Indicator (IPEEI) Based on the DPSIR Framework for Smart Sustainable Cities

“…Additionally, the entropy weight method is used to analyze the indicator weight assignment to the sustainability of multi-dimensional (Figure 5) and multi-thematic (Figure 6) quantitative evaluation for the integrated water, soil, and air environment. Besides, relevant studies [35][36][37][38][39] focus on the relationship between urban sustainability and social and economic factors in time series, with less consideration and quantitative analysis of regional differences in sustainability level. For IPEEI, it is applied to the sustainability evaluation grades according to the indicator weighted average and Jenks natural breaks classification of the comprehensive analysis (Figures 7 and 8).…”

“…Jia et al [38] evaluated the spatial and temporal variation of sustainable utilization of water resources in Henan province, China. Qiao et al [39] established a co-benefits indicator system to evaluate the co-benefits of city policies for megacities with the entropy method. However, the abovementioned studies mainly focused on the analysis of a single environmental problem, or the comprehensive environmental evaluation based on the relatively subjective prior knowledge from different evaluators.…”