2020
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/890/1/012030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the efficiency of obtaining reliable data when operating with number sets in simulation of bridges structural components

Abstract: The issue of reducing the complexity of a multifactorial simulation experiment to an acceptable level is relevant. The simulation complexity is characterized by the computing capabilities of a PC while maintaining a given level of accuracy and certainty of the problem being solved. Many authors neglect the justification of the sample size, thereby reducing the experiment’s reliability. Loads are stochastic, therefore, in the calculations, they are determined by rated and design values. However, the Monte Carlo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Live load from special equipment with an axle force PАК = 10•6/2 = 30 kN with loading length λ = 48 m installed as two concentrated loads in the most unfavorable place -in the middle of the span [20]. The width of the wheelbase is taken as 2.45 m. The dynamic coefficient for this type of transport is taken equal to 1.0, taking into account the speed of its movement, equal to 30 km/h.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Most Unfavorable Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Live load from special equipment with an axle force PАК = 10•6/2 = 30 kN with loading length λ = 48 m installed as two concentrated loads in the most unfavorable place -in the middle of the span [20]. The width of the wheelbase is taken as 2.45 m. The dynamic coefficient for this type of transport is taken equal to 1.0, taking into account the speed of its movement, equal to 30 km/h.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Most Unfavorable Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Z. and others [11][12][13][14][15][16]. There are other works in this area of research [17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%