1956
DOI: 10.1037/h0040592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the effects of frontal lesions in monkey: II. Variations of delayed response.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
45
1

Year Published

1962
1962
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(4 reference statements)
2
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This view originated from early discoveries of discrete language centers in the brain and has expanded to include current 'phrenology'-like assignment of specific cognitive processes to exact cortical locations. Behavioral correlations of discrete cortical lesions in human and animal studies, as well as neurophysiological findings of distinct integrative representations in different subregions, have supported this modular view of cognitive processing (Mishkin and Pribram, 1955;Goldman and Rosvold, 1970;Stuss and Benson, 1984;Passingham et al, 2000). The other is the connectionist view that emphasizes parallel distributed neural networks in mediation of complex cognitive processes (Edelman and Mouncastle, 1978;Goldman-Rakic, 1988;Damasio, 1989;Mesulam, 1990;Fuster, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This view originated from early discoveries of discrete language centers in the brain and has expanded to include current 'phrenology'-like assignment of specific cognitive processes to exact cortical locations. Behavioral correlations of discrete cortical lesions in human and animal studies, as well as neurophysiological findings of distinct integrative representations in different subregions, have supported this modular view of cognitive processing (Mishkin and Pribram, 1955;Goldman and Rosvold, 1970;Stuss and Benson, 1984;Passingham et al, 2000). The other is the connectionist view that emphasizes parallel distributed neural networks in mediation of complex cognitive processes (Edelman and Mouncastle, 1978;Goldman-Rakic, 1988;Damasio, 1989;Mesulam, 1990;Fuster, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This task is sensitive to dmPFC lesion (Aggleton et al, 1995;Divac, 1971;Jacobsen, 1936;Mishkin and Pribram, 1956;Simon et al, 1980). Starting from day 4 after the last self-administration session, rats were food-deprived to 85% body weight and habituated to the T-maze until they readily ate a sucrose pellet placed at the end of each arm.…”
Section: Behavioral Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test these hypotheses, the integrity of working memory under high and low cognitive demands and high-and low-incentive conditions was assessed in rats with a history of extended or limited access to cocaine 3-17 days after the last self-administration session. Working memory under high incentive and cognitive demands was measured in food-restricted rats using a delayed nonmatching-to-sample procedure, a task sensitive to prefrontal cortical dysfunction (Divac, 1971;Brozoski et al, 1979;Jacobsen, 1936;Mishkin and Pribram, 1956;Simon et al, 1980;Aggleton et al, 1995;Walton et al, 2003). Specifically, the percentage of correct responses in this task is decreased after dmPFC lesion, particularly when a delay is used to increase the working memory load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, macaques with temporary dorsolateral "lesions" brought about by cortical cooling or electrical current show significant delay-task impairments (see, e.g., Bauer & Fuster, 1976;Fuster & Bauer, 1974;Quintana & Fuster, 1993;Shindy, Posley, & Fuster, 1994;Stamm, 1961;Stamm & Rosen, 1973). However, lesions to many other brain areas, even in more ventral or superior PFC, often do not produce such deficits (see, e.g., Goldman et al, 1971;Mishkin & Pribram, 1955, 1956Oscar-Berman, 1975;Pohl, 1973;but see, e.g., Battig et al, 1960;Rosvold & Delgado, 1956;Zola-Morgan & Squire, 1985).…”
Section: Nonhuman Primate Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accuracy drops to near-chance levels in monkeys with lesions to Walker's areas 9, 10, and 46, even with delays of mere seconds (see, e.g., Battig, Rosvold, & Mishkin, 1960;Funahashi, Bruce, & Goldman-Rakic, 1993;Goldman & Rosvold, 1970;Goldman, Rosvold, Vest, & Galkin, 1971;Mishkin & Pribram, 1955, 1956Oscar-Berman, 1975;W. A. Wilson, 1962; but see Petrides, 1995).…”
Section: Nonhuman Primate Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%