2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2019.105091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the effects of geomagnetic storms in the Schumann Resonance station data in Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solar X-ray bursts (Roldugin et al, 2004b;Sátori et al, 2005;Dyrda et al, 2015;Sátori et al, 2016;Shvets et al, 2017) and solar proton events (Schlegel and Füllekrug, 1999;Roldugin et al, 2003;Singh et al, 2014) are known to cause such changes in frequencies (of both signs). In contrast, occasional variations in SR intensity with extra-terrestrial origin have been associated only with solar proton events so far (Schlegel and Füllekrug, 1999;Roldugin et al, 2003), and recently, indication for periods with increased SR intensity during geomagnetic storms was demonstrated as well (Salinas et al, 2016;Pazos et al, 2019). We note that variations in SR were also reported connected to seismic activity (e.g., Christofilakis et al, 2019;Galuk et al, 2019;Florios et al, 2020;Hayakawa et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Solar X-ray bursts (Roldugin et al, 2004b;Sátori et al, 2005;Dyrda et al, 2015;Sátori et al, 2016;Shvets et al, 2017) and solar proton events (Schlegel and Füllekrug, 1999;Roldugin et al, 2003;Singh et al, 2014) are known to cause such changes in frequencies (of both signs). In contrast, occasional variations in SR intensity with extra-terrestrial origin have been associated only with solar proton events so far (Schlegel and Füllekrug, 1999;Roldugin et al, 2003), and recently, indication for periods with increased SR intensity during geomagnetic storms was demonstrated as well (Salinas et al, 2016;Pazos et al, 2019). We note that variations in SR were also reported connected to seismic activity (e.g., Christofilakis et al, 2019;Galuk et al, 2019;Florios et al, 2020;Hayakawa et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Changes in the properties of the Earth‐ionosphere cavity, that is, the propagation conditions of ELF waves on the even longer interannual time scale (Bozóki et al., 2021), are another challenge that needs to be addressed in the future. Shorter timescale changes in the properties of the Earth‐ionosphere cavity associated with space weather, for example, connected with energetic electron precipitation (Bozóki et al., 2021), with geomagnetic storms (Pazos et al., 2019; Salinas et al., 2016), with solar proton events (Roldugin et al., 2003; Schlegel & Füllekrug, 1999), and with the solar rotation (Füllekrug & Fraser‐Smith, 1996) can also bias the SR‐based characterization of global lightning activity. However, in the present study there is no clear evidence of a significant space weather effect based on comparisons with independent lightning observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the lightning ELF phenomena community, the investigations in 2019 focus on the modeling of the ionospheric cavity through various computational techniques with the aim of establishing a model as real as possible [118]. SR measures are still used for the reconstruction of global lightning activity [24] or for the analysis of the effects of geomagnetic storms [119], coinciding most of the works in which the number of SR measurement stations should increase in the near future to correlate the records. The relationship between SR perturbations and seismic activity is also currently being investigated [21] in order to carry out an increasingly effective prediction of the presence of seismic phenomena and alert the population of their effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%