2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep08614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the effects of evaporative cooling on the evaporation of liquid droplets using a combined field approach

Abstract: During liquid evaporation, the equations for the vapor concentration in the atmosphere and for the temperature in the liquid are coupled and must be solved in an iterative manner. In the present paper, a combined field approach which unifies the coupled fields into one single hybrid field and thus makes the iteration unnecessary is proposed. By using this approach, the influences of the evaporative cooling on the evaporation of pinned sessile droplets are investigated, and its predictions are found in good agr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since E c is around 1, which enters the regime that evaporation cooling may considerably reduce the saturation pressure and thus reduce the evaporative flux. According to the studies of evaporative cooling effect on a sessile methanol droplet, the range of temperature difference within the droplet is about 2 degree kelvin [42], which corresponds to $10 to 15% reduction of evaporative flux [41], and $3% increase of the local viscosity. By neglecting evaporative cooling, our modeling results would have over-predicted (instead of under-predicted) the evaporation rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since E c is around 1, which enters the regime that evaporation cooling may considerably reduce the saturation pressure and thus reduce the evaporative flux. According to the studies of evaporative cooling effect on a sessile methanol droplet, the range of temperature difference within the droplet is about 2 degree kelvin [42], which corresponds to $10 to 15% reduction of evaporative flux [41], and $3% increase of the local viscosity. By neglecting evaporative cooling, our modeling results would have over-predicted (instead of under-predicted) the evaporation rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the Fourier number F o ¼ sa ð'Þ =d 2 , Brinkman number B r ¼ l ð'Þ U 2 =ðj ð'Þ MT ð'Þ Þ, and the Evaporation cooling number [41] E c ¼ L v D ðgÞ c 1 =j ð'Þ . The parameters T ð'Þ and u are scaled temperature and velocity fields, respectively, and q ðgÞ M is the scaled methanol vapor mass concentration at the interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 If we consider T 1 , T 2 , and T 3 as the temperature in the air, in the liquid and in the substrate, respectively, the abovementioned eqn (1)-(9) represent a heat conduction field in the surrounding air with thermal conductivity of E c , in the liquid droplet with a thermal conductivity of 1, and in the substrate with thermal conductivity of k R . The larger the value of E c , the more significant the negative feedback effect of evaporative cooling, which reduces the evaporation rate.…”
Section: Mathematic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 The contact angle y indicates the spatial configuration of the droplet. The number E c characterizes the strength of the evaporative cooling and its value is determined only by the thermal properties of the liquid and the atmosphere.…”
Section: Mathematic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation