2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.996504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the effect of cognitive ability on academic achievement: Moderating role of self-monitoring

Abstract: In this study, cognitive ability was classified into memory ability, representational ability, information processing ability, logical reasoning ability, and thinking conversion ability, and analyzed the effects of these five ability values on academic achievement. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the moderating effect of Self-monitoring between cognitive ability and Academic Achievement, using students’ Self-monitoring as moderating variables. The results of the study showed that cogniti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the development of metacognitive skills, research indicates that learning tasks must be stimulating and rewarding enough for students to use metacognitive skills specifically. This implies that applying metacognitive knowledge only benefits when the learning task falls within a subjectively moderate difficulty range [30], which is advantageous for teachers. While designing the same testing method for all intermediate-level students may seem like an incredible burden for teachers, modern paradigms of individualised education support this notion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the development of metacognitive skills, research indicates that learning tasks must be stimulating and rewarding enough for students to use metacognitive skills specifically. This implies that applying metacognitive knowledge only benefits when the learning task falls within a subjectively moderate difficulty range [30], which is advantageous for teachers. While designing the same testing method for all intermediate-level students may seem like an incredible burden for teachers, modern paradigms of individualised education support this notion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%