Analysis of the Effect of Rational Emotional Intervention Combined with Hierarchical Management Mode on Improving the Psychological Stress of Emergency Nurses and Trainee Nurses

Abstract

Purpose. To explore the effect of rational emotional intervention combined with hierarchical management mode on improving the psychological stress of emergency nurses and trainee nurses. Methods. 50 emergency nurses who worked or practiced in our hospital from June 2019 to May 2021 were selected as the research object. From June 2019 to May 2020, our hospital adopted the traditional management mode. From June 2020 to May 2021, our hospital adopted the rational emotional intervention combined with hierarchical management mode. The psychological state, work stress, stress response, job burnout, and sleep quality of emergency nurses were compared before and after intervention. Results. Compared with before intervention, the scores of self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale, the work stress scores, the Maslach burnout inventory score, the Pittsburgh sleep quality index score of emergency nurses decreased after intervention ( P < 0.05 ). Compared with before intervention, the stress coping scores of emergency nurses increased after intervention ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion. The rational emotional intervention combined with hierarchical management mode can improve the psychological pressure of emergency nurses and trainee nurses, reduce job burnout, improve stress coping ability, and improve sleep quality.

Influence of Job Burnout on Decision-Making and Coping With Stress Among Nurses

“…Moreover, the psychological state of nurses should be monitored, and good communications should be maintained with the nurses. The nurses should be encouraged to seek psychological counseling 19 or emotional release 20,21 if they have emotional problems. Our hospital established a kindergarten for employees with children to solve the workers' parenting difficulties.…”

“…In addition, psychological training sessions addressing job burnout among nurses should be held. [19][20][21] Finally, nurses should be encouraged to seek social support, resort to institutional psychological counseling hotline services, or even a brief online form of Emotional Freedom Techniques, once a month if there is any need to do so. [19][20][21] Our hospital will invite psychologist to teach the employees about psychological techniques like deep breathing relaxation training and psychology knowledge classes, and holding friendly conversation.…”

“…Through these activities, our hospital tries to give some social supports to relieve the psychological pressure and work pressure of the nurses and other medical workers. In addition, psychological training sessions addressing job burnout among nurses should be held 19–21. Finally, nurses should be encouraged to seek social support, resort to institutional psychological counseling hotline services, or even a brief online form of Emotional Freedom Techniques, once a month if there is any need to do so 19–21.…”

Development of a nurse-manager dualistic intervention program to alleviate burnout among nurses based on the appreciative inquiry

“…Adams et al ( 2019 ) used a 2-month cultural change toolkit, including meaningful recognition, shared decision-making, and increased leadership involvement and support, to promote nurse burnout and found a significant burnout reduction after the implementation. Liu et al ( 2022 ) provided a 1-year rational emotional intervention combined with hierarchical management to burnout nurses and found that nurses experienced lower levels of burnout after the intervention. Given the comprehensiveness of combined interventions, it is recommended as the most effective intervention type.…”

Retracted: Analysis of the Effect of Rational Emotional Intervention Combined with Hierarchical Management Mode on Improving the Psychological Stress of Emergency Nurses and Trainee Nurses

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Manipulated or compromised peer review …”