2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the effect of temperature, pH, CO2 pressure and salinity on the olivine dissolution kinetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This justifies the use of either magnesium or silica release rate for calculations (Rimstidt et al 2012). When compiling data for a given temperature of 120¡C, Prigiobbe et al (2009) show that the rate of olivine dissolution mainly depends on pH for pH values greater than 8 (Fig. 4); pCO 2 and NaCl concentration affect the rate through their effect on pH.…”
Section: Carbon Dioxide-water-rock Interactions In Reservoir Rocks Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This justifies the use of either magnesium or silica release rate for calculations (Rimstidt et al 2012). When compiling data for a given temperature of 120¡C, Prigiobbe et al (2009) show that the rate of olivine dissolution mainly depends on pH for pH values greater than 8 (Fig. 4); pCO 2 and NaCl concentration affect the rate through their effect on pH.…”
Section: Carbon Dioxide-water-rock Interactions In Reservoir Rocks Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Giammar et al, 2005;Oelkers et al, 2008;Prigiobbe et al, 2009;King et al, 2010;Daval et al, 2011;Guyot et al, 2011;Gudbrandsson et al, 2012;Saldi et al, 2013). The overall rate of olivine carbonation stems from the coupling of forsterite dissolution rates with Mg-carbonate precipitation rates.…”
Section: Implications For Carbon Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reactivity of forsterite and its silicate alteration products has received increasing attention as a potential source material for the divalent cations required to carbonate CO 2 during carbon storage efforts (e.g. Giammar et al, 2005;Oelkers and Schott, 2005;Bearat et al, 2006;Matter et al, 2007;Oelkers et al, 2008;Dufaud et al, 2009;Prigiobbe et al, 2009;Matter and Kelemen, 2009;King et al, 2010;Daval et al, 2011;Guyot et al, 2011;Broecker, 2012;Kohler et al, 2013;Gislason and Oelkers, 2014;Sissmann et al, 2014). This interest has led to a large number of studies aimed at characterizing forsterite dissolution behavior and rates at various fluid compositions and temperatures (Luce et al, 1972;Sanemasa et al, 1972, Grandstaff, 1978, 1986, Murphy and Helgeson, 1987, 1989Blum andLasaga, 1988, Banfield et al, 1990;Walther, 1991, 1992;Casey and Westrich, 1992, Awad et al, 2000, Chen and Brantley, 2000, Rosso and Rimstidt, 2000, Pokrovsky and Schott, 2000a, 2000b, Oelkers, 2001b, Giammar et al, 2005, Hänchen et al, 2006, Olsen and Rimstidt, 2008Davis et al, 2009;Rimstidt et al, 2012;Olsson et al, 2012;Plümper et al, 201...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luce et al, 1972;Van Herk et al, 1989;Wogelius and Walther, 1991;Chen and Brantley, 2000;Pokrovski and Schott, 2000;Giammar et al, 2004;Hanchen et al, 2006;Prigiobbe et al, 2009). …”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%