2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.02.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the dominant vibration frequencies of rail bridges for structure-borne noise using a power flow method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak frequency of the SPL ranges 40-125 Hz, in agreement with the frequency range of the force transmitted from the track to the bridge [23]. The SPL at measurement point S 5 reaches its lowest level at 80-630 Hz, where bridge-borne noise is dominant; the latter is attenuated with increasing distance.…”
Section: Steel-concrete Composite Bridgessupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The peak frequency of the SPL ranges 40-125 Hz, in agreement with the frequency range of the force transmitted from the track to the bridge [23]. The SPL at measurement point S 5 reaches its lowest level at 80-630 Hz, where bridge-borne noise is dominant; the latter is attenuated with increasing distance.…”
Section: Steel-concrete Composite Bridgessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Moreover, although the energy from higher-frequency vibrations is transmitted from the track to the bridge structure with rapid attenuation, there are still some weaker vibration peaks. Li and Wu [23] reported that wheel-rail contact forces and power flows to the rail-bridge subsystem were primarily [21] driven by contents around the natural frequency of a single wheel adhering to the elastically supported rail, providing a mechanism to determine the dominant frequencies of bridge vibrations. However, the local, natural vibrational characteristics of bridge slabs were ignored.…”
Section: All-concrete Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power flow analysis has been widely used to investigate the steady-state responses of coupled structural systems made up of various subsystems. Li and Wu [16] recently proposed a force-method-based [17,18] power flow approach to determine the structure mobility of a vehicle-track-bridge system and the power input to each subsystem. As shown in Ref.…”
Section: Vibration Of Bridge and Railmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the original structures are coupled by the spring-dashpot pairs, the relative compression or tension displacement of a spring-dashpot pair due to its internal force should be consistent with the gap change (relative displacement) between the two nodes on the released structures where the spring is connected. Thus the compatibility equations can be expressed as [16] α…”
Section: Vibration Of Bridge and Railmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the latter method 33,34 , the compatibility equation of the discretely supported rail for harmonic motion at angular frequency  is expressed as . Then the residual method 31 is applied to calculate the mobilities of the free rail subjected to a point force at the rail head node and each node of the rail model corresponding to a support spring.…”
Section: Track Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%