2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00211-016-0791-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the domain mapping method for elliptic diffusion problems on random domains

Abstract: In this article, we provide a rigorous analysis of the solution to elliptic diffusion problems on random domains. In particular, based on the decay of the Karhunen-Loève expansion of the domain perturbation field, we establish decay rates for the derivatives of the random solution that are independent of the stochastic dimension. For the implementation of a related approximation scheme, like quasi-Monte Carlo quadrature, stochastic collocation, etc., we propose parametric finite elements to compute the solutio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
135
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
135
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Representation of random domains. In this section, we introduce a description of random obstacles by means of random vector fields, as they have originally been considered in [11] in the context of the domain mapping method. To that end, let (Ω, A, P) denote a complete and separable probability space with σ-algebra A and probability measure P. Here, complete means that A contains all P-null sets.…”
Section: Random Obstaclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representation of random domains. In this section, we introduce a description of random obstacles by means of random vector fields, as they have originally been considered in [11] in the context of the domain mapping method. To that end, let (Ω, A, P) denote a complete and separable probability space with σ-algebra A and probability measure P. Here, complete means that A contains all P-null sets.…”
Section: Random Obstaclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the fictitious domain approach considered in [7], one might essentially distinguish two approaches: the domain mapping method, cf. [8,19,16,28,27], and the perturbation method, cf. [14,17], which is based on shape derivatives.…”
Section: Motivation and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6,21,27,38,41], and the perturbation method. They result from a description of the random domain either in Lagrangian coordinates or in Eulerian coordinates, see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%