2000
DOI: 10.3354/ame021001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the distribution of ingested bacteria in nanoflagellates and estimation of grazing rates with flow cytometry

Abstract: The distribution of ingested bacteria in nanoflagellates was assessed to suggest whether or not there are subgroups of grazers with different grazing rates. Several discrete random distributions were compared to the distribution of ingested fluorescently labeled bacteria (FLB) in cultures of Rhynchomonas nasuta and Paraphysomonas vestita. Sample distributions typically fit both the Poisson with extra zeros (Poisson EZ, tested as a truncated Poisson) and negative binomial, but only occasionally fit a Poisson. B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7) and comparable investigations (Bratvold et al 2000 and references therein) reflects specimens that did not feed during the period of incubation or others that do permanently select against FLB. Both possibilites may include experimental artifacts.…”
Section: Potential Shortcomings Of the Flb Approachmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7) and comparable investigations (Bratvold et al 2000 and references therein) reflects specimens that did not feed during the period of incubation or others that do permanently select against FLB. Both possibilites may include experimental artifacts.…”
Section: Potential Shortcomings Of the Flb Approachmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…To minimize the handling effect, we reduced subsampling to 3 occasions (0, 20, 30 min) during each experiment. The physiological conditions of the grazers such as their nutritional status (Hatzis et al 1993, Jürgens & DeMott 1995 or the timing of their cell division and mouth-part formation may also lead to temporary non-feeding (Bratvold et al 2000). Prolongation of the experimental period does not overcome this problem, because incubation times in excess of digestion time yield unrealistic results (e.g.…”
Section: Potential Shortcomings Of the Flb Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NB distributions are often found among bacterial counts in various scales, including repeated measurements and spatial or temporal distribution of specific bacteria (14,19,26,47), which correspond to distributions of ␣ i or ␥ ijk in the model of equation 1. A published case of NB distribution of bacterial cells in a microscope scale, i.e., the scale of ε ijkl in equation 1, can be found in counts of ingested bacteria within nanoflagellate cells (11). The authors of the latter study interpreted that the mechanism of NB distribution was the summation of different grazing rates of subpopulations of the protozoa.…”
Section: Vol 76 2010 Comparison Of Microscopic Direct Count Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Bougrier et al (1997) used flow cytometry to study preingestive selection of different microalgal mixtures in Crassostrea gigas and Mytilus edulis. A rapid cytometric method assessing the distribution of ingested bacteria in nanoflagellates was presented by Bratvold et al (2000), investigating grazing behaviour of cultures of Rhynchomonas nasuta and Paraphysomonas vestita. Their results suggest a heterogeneous population composed of subgroups of flagellates with different grazing rates, although the specific biological implications of the statistical models used with regard to the number of flagellate subgroups remain to be proven.…”
Section: Size and Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%