2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-022-02543-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia and Corvis ST parameters for subclinical keratoconus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 1.65, the false positive rate for even clinically manifest KCN is only 5% (32). Its validity as a screening tool has achieved widespread consensus (13,15,24,25,(33)(34)(35)(36), with area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) for KCN ranging from 0.83-0.93 (13,15,21,31,(33)(34)(35). Even among SKCN and normal eyes, the BAD-D is replicable with low variations on repeat scans within a similar session (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 1.65, the false positive rate for even clinically manifest KCN is only 5% (32). Its validity as a screening tool has achieved widespread consensus (13,15,24,25,(33)(34)(35)(36), with area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) for KCN ranging from 0.83-0.93 (13,15,21,31,(33)(34)(35). Even among SKCN and normal eyes, the BAD-D is replicable with low variations on repeat scans within a similar session (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Scheimpflug-based corneal imaging such as Pentacam (Pentacam, OCULUS GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) is a method that analyzes both anterior and posterior corneal elevation data and has become established for the diagnosis, grading and follow-up of KC [10][11][12][13]. The Belin/Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display (BAD) has been demonstrated to have a high sensitivity and is especially useful in the detection of early and subclinical KC [14,15]. BAD criteria include the standard deviation (SD) of mean changes in the anterior elevation (df), the SD of mean changes in the posterior elevation (db), the SD of the mean pachymetric progression (dp), the SD of the mean thinnest point thickness (dt), the SD of the mean thinnest point displacement (dy) and the D score, which is calculated by a regression analysis of five determinants [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%