1968
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(68)90176-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the decay of ρ− mesons produced in π−p interactions at 2.26 GeV/c

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1970
1970

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous analysis has shown that the assumption of a> exchange is not simultaneously compatible with both the production and decay angular distribution of the p~ in this experiment. 29 Third, there are currently three experiments with rather good statistics at 2.10, 2.26, and 2.36 GeV/c. The experiment at 2.10 GtV/c has been reported by West et al 17 The experiment at 2.36 GeV/c was conducted by Schultz.…”
Section: Resonance Production In X~« + N Final Statementioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A previous analysis has shown that the assumption of a> exchange is not simultaneously compatible with both the production and decay angular distribution of the p~ in this experiment. 29 Third, there are currently three experiments with rather good statistics at 2.10, 2.26, and 2.36 GeV/c. The experiment at 2.10 GtV/c has been reported by West et al 17 The experiment at 2.36 GeV/c was conducted by Schultz.…”
Section: Resonance Production In X~« + N Final Statementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Second, it has already been shown that the p~ production and decay angular distribution cannot always be completely described by the OPEA model. 16,29 This fact allows speculation as to the possible effects of the other allowed exchange particles. A previous analysis has shown that the assumption of a> exchange is not simultaneously compatible with both the production and decay angular distribution of the p~ in this experiment.…”
Section: Resonance Production In X~« + N Final Statementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation