1997
DOI: 10.1007/s004380050534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the cis-acting DNA elements required for piggyBac transposable element excision

Abstract: The terminal DNA sequence requirements for piggyBac transposable element excision were explored using a plasmid-based assay in transfected, cultured insect cells. A donor plasmid containing duplicate 3' piggyBac terminal inverted repeats was constructed that allowed individual nucleotides or groups of nucleotides within one of the 3' repeats to be mutated. The relative extent of excision using the mutated end versus the wild-type end was then assayed. Removal of even one of the terminal 3' G nucleotides from t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
30
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
30
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Assays for excision and interplasmid transposition con®rmed that piggyBac transposes via a strict``cut-and-paste'' mechanism (Elick et al 1996b;Lobo et al 1999;Thibault et al 1999), inserting exclusively at 5¢-TTAA-3¢ target sites that are duplicated upon insertion (Cary et al 1989;Wang and Fraser 1993;Fraser et al 1995;Elick et al 1996b), and excising precisely (Elick et al 1996b;Fraser et al 1996) leaving no footprint. Excision assays using both wild-type and mutagenized piggyBac terminal sequences demonstrated that the element does not discriminate between proximal and distal duplicated ends, and suggest that the transposase does not ®rst recognize an internal binding site and then scan towards the ends (Elick et al 1997). These results dier from those obtained in similar experiments using the P element, for which binding to the proximal terminal repeat is highly favored (Mullins et al 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assays for excision and interplasmid transposition con®rmed that piggyBac transposes via a strict``cut-and-paste'' mechanism (Elick et al 1996b;Lobo et al 1999;Thibault et al 1999), inserting exclusively at 5¢-TTAA-3¢ target sites that are duplicated upon insertion (Cary et al 1989;Wang and Fraser 1993;Fraser et al 1995;Elick et al 1996b), and excising precisely (Elick et al 1996b;Fraser et al 1996) leaving no footprint. Excision assays using both wild-type and mutagenized piggyBac terminal sequences demonstrated that the element does not discriminate between proximal and distal duplicated ends, and suggest that the transposase does not ®rst recognize an internal binding site and then scan towards the ends (Elick et al 1997). These results dier from those obtained in similar experiments using the P element, for which binding to the proximal terminal repeat is highly favored (Mullins et al 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…These results dier from those obtained in similar experiments using the P element, for which binding to the proximal terminal repeat is highly favored (Mullins et al 1989). Mutagenesis of the terminal trinucleotides or the terminal-proximate 3 bp of the TTAA target sequence eliminates excision at the altered terminus (Elick et al 1997). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This element has been effectively harnessed, with minimized sequences identified [86]. piggyBac is active in many vertebrates tested to date [87][88][89][90].…”
Section: Pif/harbinger Familymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PB transposon, derived from the cabbage looper moth Trichoplusia ni, was originally identified in the genome of baculovirus-infected insect cells, giving rise to the name piggyBac (Cary et al, 1989;Fraser et al, 1995Fraser et al, , 1996. The original PB element was approximately 2.4 kb with identical 13-base pair (bp) terminal inverted repeats and additional asymmetric 19-bp internal repeats (Elick et al, 1997;Li et al, 2001Li et al, , 2005. PB is typically thought to mediate precise excision of transposon segments in mouse (Ding et al, 2005) and human cells through a cut-and-paste mechanism, resulting in complementary TTAA overhangs on the ends of the donor DNA and ligation of these ends to restore the donor site to its pretransposon sequence (Cary et al, 1989;Ding et al, 2005;Fraser et al, 1995;Wu et al, 2006;Wilson et al, 2007;Mitra et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%