2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.04.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the chemical composition distribution of ethylene/α-olefin copolymers by solution differential scanning calorimetry: an alternative technique to Crystaf

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultimate mechanical properties and crack resistance improve as the length of the side branch increases, possibly because SCB influences morphology and tie-molecule concentration, requiring greater energy to be absorbed to initiate cracks [33]. SCB is usually detected and quantified using analytical techniques like solution differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), temperature rising elution fractionation (TREF), and crystallization analysis fractionation (CRYSTAF) [34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimate mechanical properties and crack resistance improve as the length of the side branch increases, possibly because SCB influences morphology and tie-molecule concentration, requiring greater energy to be absorbed to initiate cracks [33]. SCB is usually detected and quantified using analytical techniques like solution differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), temperature rising elution fractionation (TREF), and crystallization analysis fractionation (CRYSTAF) [34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the melting enthalpy (DH m ) of an E/a-olefin copolymer decreases with increasing the content of the comonomer [26], the insertion of the a-olefin reducing both the degree of crystallinity and the melting temperature of the copolymer [27,28]. Randall evidenced that for E/a-olefin copolymers including E/H copolymers the density of the sample decreases with increasing the comonomer content [29,30].…”
Section: Physico-chemical Measurements and Analytical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Crystaf curves became broader as Sarzotti et al reported previously. 15 Figures 4 to 7 show the difference between TREF and Crystaf curves for the same copolymer sample. All peaks in Crystaf curves were lower than that of TREF curve, resulting from the supercooling effect, similar to what could be observed between the heating and cooling cycles in DSC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%