2022
DOI: 10.1109/ojpel.2022.3167548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Capacitor-Less D-STATCOM for Voltage Profile Improvement in Distribution Network With High PV Penetration

Abstract: Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) have disrupted the traditional electrical system. Grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) systems deliver electric energy closer to the consumer, shifting the paradigm from centralized to distributed generation. The impact of the stochastic PV output power gives rise to potentially rapid voltage fluctuations. Reactive power compensation is needed to regulate the voltage profile to meet the relevant standards. Traditional approaches like switched capacitors cannot provide reactive p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The D-STATCOM's devices allow injections inside the electrical system reactive power in a controlled manner realtive to the electrical network by obtaining different technical and economic benefits that are related to the objective function fixed by the operator of the electrical grid [17]. The benefits are more commonly related to the reduction in power loss, improvements in voltage profiles, chargeability of the branches, harmonic mitigation, power loss cost, energy purchasing cost, and investment costs, among others [18][19][20]. It is important to highlight that these benefits depend on the location and sizing of D-STACOMs within the electrical network, for which it is vital to propose a mathematical model that evaluates the effect of the integration of D-STATCOMs, allowing the identification of the location and nominal power of D-STATCOMs that present the best impact in terms of an objective function established by the grid operator [21].…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The D-STATCOM's devices allow injections inside the electrical system reactive power in a controlled manner realtive to the electrical network by obtaining different technical and economic benefits that are related to the objective function fixed by the operator of the electrical grid [17]. The benefits are more commonly related to the reduction in power loss, improvements in voltage profiles, chargeability of the branches, harmonic mitigation, power loss cost, energy purchasing cost, and investment costs, among others [18][19][20]. It is important to highlight that these benefits depend on the location and sizing of D-STACOMs within the electrical network, for which it is vital to propose a mathematical model that evaluates the effect of the integration of D-STATCOMs, allowing the identification of the location and nominal power of D-STATCOMs that present the best impact in terms of an objective function established by the grid operator [21].…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other examples of power electronics-based solid-state devices used for mitigating the adverse impact of DERs include static var compensators (SVCs) at transmission or sub-transmission voltage levels and D-STATCOMs based on voltage source converter (VSC) technology. A major disadvantage of the SVCs is the lack of harmonic control functionality and exorbitant capital costs in low voltage regimes [3]. Due to these reasons, SVCs are inherently not suitable for use in low-voltage networks that are plagued by power quality issues due to the increased use of nonlinear loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the VSC-based D-STATCOMs rely on electrolytic capacitors (E-caps) for energy storage. The reliance on E-caps adversely affects the reliability of the VSC-based D-STATCOMs, especially in locations with tropical climate conditions [3]. The literature on the reliability of the power electronics devices has established that nearly 30% of all the failures in power electronics-based devices are caused by the E-caps [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, Ali Elrayyah proposed a novel load-flow analysis algorithm to select the droop parameters that optimize the reactive power sharing for droop-based islanded microgrids [4]. W. Rohouma examined an alternative distribution static synchronous compensator based on a matrix converter in order to regulate the voltage profile to meet the relevant standards [5]. M. Moghbel introduced a new custom power device for real-time control of reactive power and improving network voltage quality [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%