2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-016-0811-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the benefit of sequential cranial radiotherapy in patients with EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastasis

Abstract: Although cranial radiotherapy is considered the standard treatment for brain metastasis (BM), EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown promising activity in EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with BM. However, the efficacy of sequential cranial radiotherapy in patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC who are treated with EGFR TKIs remains to be determined. Patients with NSCLC who harbored an EGFR mutation and whose BM had been treated with EGFR TKIs were retrospectively reviewed. The clini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients who received best supportive care alone were excluded from this analysis. was no significant difference in OS according to the type of initial treatment (local vs. systemic) for patients with a driver mutation in our study, and similar results have been reported by several retrospective studies comparing upfront radiotherapy and EGFR-TKI for NSCLC patients with an EGFR mutation [17][18][19]. In contrast, Magnuson et al [20] reported that the use of upfront EGFR-TKI was associated with an inferior OS compared with upfront radiotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Patients who received best supportive care alone were excluded from this analysis. was no significant difference in OS according to the type of initial treatment (local vs. systemic) for patients with a driver mutation in our study, and similar results have been reported by several retrospective studies comparing upfront radiotherapy and EGFR-TKI for NSCLC patients with an EGFR mutation [17][18][19]. In contrast, Magnuson et al [20] reported that the use of upfront EGFR-TKI was associated with an inferior OS compared with upfront radiotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Subsequent studies in EGFRact+ patients have demonstrated a RR of 87.8% as monotherapy with overall survival (OS) 21.9 months [23••]. Gefitinib is the most common first line TKI in Asian countries and retrospective studies of EGFRact+ enriched populations have supported the use of TKIs as monotherapy without radiation [24, 25•, 26]. …”
Section: Systemic Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small studies examining the use of TKIs and WBRT have provided conflicting results and it remains unclear if addition of TKI to radiotherapy improved survival [81] or could possibly have deleterious effects [82]. In contrast, clinical trials have reported that patients were limited in receiving subsequent systemic treatment due to deteriorations in performance status after WBRT [26]. Meta-analysis also confirms more side effects with radiotherapy compared to TKIs alone [83•].…”
Section: Local Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the choice of SRS, alectinib, or both has yet to be delineated in prospective trials. In patients harboring an EGFR mutation, the addition of TKI therapy to SRS or WBRT has so far met with mixed results (22)(23)(24). The possibility of treating with alectinib first and using SRS for lesions that persist after therapy remains an option that has not been tested.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%