2023
DOI: 10.3390/app13095228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Bearing Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Dapped-End Beams

Abstract: The dapped-end beam is a widely utilized structural component that offers many benefits in real-world applications. However, abrupt changes in the geometry result in complex stress flows, rendering conventional calculation methods unreliable. The estimation of the bearing capacity becomes particularly challenging when such elements are designed with prestressed reinforcement. Previous studies have identified that prestressing can have a negative impact on the behavior of dapped-end beams in specific configurat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prestressed tendons compressing the dap wall reduce resistance to cracking because the tensile stress concentrated in the reentrant corner adds up to the previously mentioned splitting and spalling effects. This issue is widely described in the literature [28,29], and yet there are still projects in which the reinforcement of the cut end was underestimated and the horizontal or vertical hanger and shear rebars were insufficiently anchored. Corner cracks typically exceed width limits, so repairing such areas typically involves resin injection and external composite or steel overwrap.…”
Section: Incorrect Construction Of Reinforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prestressed tendons compressing the dap wall reduce resistance to cracking because the tensile stress concentrated in the reentrant corner adds up to the previously mentioned splitting and spalling effects. This issue is widely described in the literature [28,29], and yet there are still projects in which the reinforcement of the cut end was underestimated and the horizontal or vertical hanger and shear rebars were insufficiently anchored. Corner cracks typically exceed width limits, so repairing such areas typically involves resin injection and external composite or steel overwrap.…”
Section: Incorrect Construction Of Reinforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even with the full volumetric replacement of the natural aggregate with a fraction of EPS beads at 2/4 mm, it was still possible to achieve mortars with 20 MPa of compressive strength. Such mortars still have sufficient bearing capacity [63]. In addition, Babu et al reported that cement-based composites with an EPS content result in materials with higher strength properties compared with those filled with other artificial aggregates, like perlite or vermiculite [8].…”
Section: Strength Parameters: Flexural and Compressive Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the direction of stresses, not the arrangement of a specific group in the diagonal reinforcement (DR) group, was more effective than the vertical hanger reinforcement (HR) group. According to Masėnas et al [21], other methods, such as strut and tie models, require adequate changes to accurately represent acting forces in studied zones and therefore should be used primarily for designing or as a baseline to be updated for configuration-specific analysis. The PCI technique is less conservative, and Wang's semi-empirical truss model, the EC2 6.2 section, frequently overestimates shear strength, making it unsuitable for dapped -end beam design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%