2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-05318-5_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the AutoML Challenge Series 2015–2018

Abstract: The ChaLearn AutoML Challenge (The authors are in alphabetical order of last name, except the first author who did most of the writing and the second author who produced most of the numerical analyses and plots.) (NIPS 2015-ICML 2016) consisted of six rounds of a machine learning competition of progressive difficulty, subject to limited computational resources. It was followed by

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
79
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
79
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Few participants used this model in combination with another one (either a linear model or a Gaussian process). This trend is in agreement with other challenges12 [7], and in general with supervised learning trends. It is also interesting that even when this was an AutoML challenge most participants did not perform an optimization of hyperparameters, this could be due to the limited resources and the size of the datasets.…”
Section: Overview Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Few participants used this model in combination with another one (either a linear model or a Gaussian process). This trend is in agreement with other challenges12 [7], and in general with supervised learning trends. It is also interesting that even when this was an AutoML challenge most participants did not perform an optimization of hyperparameters, this could be due to the limited resources and the size of the datasets.…”
Section: Overview Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In this section, we evaluate the usefulness of AutoML for application in business and industry by empirically comparing the most successful automated machine learning algorithms with (a) an industrial prototype as well as (b) a straight-forward improvement inspired by Hyperband [13], [43] (c). This selection spans a wide range of different approaches for pipeline optimization (see Section III) to tackle the CASH problem: the industrial prototype DSM [44] uses random model and hyperparameter search and thus serves as a baseline; Auto-sklearn [17] has won the recent AutoML challenges [33]. Additionally, we report results with TPOT [45], which is developed based on genetic programming [40] instead of Auto-sklearn's Bayesian optimization.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TPOT [45]: This algorithm uses tree-based classifiers which is similar to the second entry of the latest AutoML challenge [33]. TPOT differs from the other presented methods since it used Genetic programming for optimization.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations