The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1992
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.46.7011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the atomic geometries of the (101¯0) and (112¯0) surfaces of CdSe by low-energy-electron diffraction and low-energy-positron diffraction

Abstract: The relaxed atomic geometries of the low-index cleavage surfaces of wurtzite-structure CdSe are determined via comparison of dynamical scattering calculations with measured low-energyelectron-difFraction (LEED) and low-energy-positron-difFraction (LEPD) intensities. Both surfaces are found to be relaxed in accordance with recently proposed geometries deduced from total-energyminimization calculations. Since this analysis represents the use of LEPD for quantitative surfacestructure determination, we discuss the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
21
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
11
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon is similar to that found in the surface relaxations of CdS and CdSe clusters, 12,22,42,43 where the outermost Cd atoms move inwards while the S or Se atoms move outwards.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This phenomenon is similar to that found in the surface relaxations of CdS and CdSe clusters, 12,22,42,43 where the outermost Cd atoms move inwards while the S or Se atoms move outwards.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…It needs a very important set of experimental data, first principle simulations and the use of objective confidence factors for comparing experiment and theory [22,23]. Thus, no less than 50 reflections, were recorded over an energy range of 120 eV around the Fe K-edge and at T=50K.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other criteria, which keep a unique normalization coefficient between experiment and theory, proved to be unsuccessful as it is explained in the next chapter. A second confidence factor, a R factor called Rx by Horsky et al, 37 was used as well. Its main difference with D 1 is that the latter is related to the square of the difference between the spectra.…”
Section: Comparison Between Experiments and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%