Proceedings of the 14th ACM/SIGEVO Conference on Foundations of Genetic Algorithms 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3040718.3040728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the (1+1) EA on Subclasses of Linear Functions under Uniform and Linear Constraints

Abstract: After the embargo period via non-commercial hosting platforms such as their institutional repository  via commercial sites with which Elsevier has an agreement In all cases accepted manuscripts should: link to the formal publication via its DOI  bear a CC-BY-NC-ND licensethis is easy to do  if aggregated with other manuscripts, for example in a repository or other site, be shared in alignment with our hosting policy  not be added to or enhanced in any way to appear more like, or to substitute for, the pu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this paper, we have contributed to the theoretical understanding of evolutionary algorithms for constrained optimization problems by means of rigorous runtime analysis. We generalized the result for the (1+1) EA obtained for uniform weights given in [1] to favorably correlated weights. Furthermore, we investigated the multi-objective formulation of the knapsack problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…With this paper, we have contributed to the theoretical understanding of evolutionary algorithms for constrained optimization problems by means of rigorous runtime analysis. We generalized the result for the (1+1) EA obtained for uniform weights given in [1] to favorably correlated weights. Furthermore, we investigated the multi-objective formulation of the knapsack problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It should be noted that Ω(n 2 ) is a lower bound for the (1+1) EA for knapsack instances with favorably correlated weights as this bounds already holds for special instances where the weights are all 1 [1]. The reason for this lower bound are special 2-bit flips that are necessary in the case that a current non-optimal solution has a maximal number of 1-bits.…”
Section: Runtime Analysis Of (1+1) Eamentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations