IEEE INFOCOM 2017 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications 2017
DOI: 10.1109/infocom.2017.8057191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of tandem PIT and CS with non-zero download delay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall that this assumption has been shown to produce significant errors (even in the zero object fetch delay regime) [7]. Further work that considers the download delay time for objects in single LRU caches includes [26,27], where the authors propose variants of the LRU algorithm that work better under non-zero delay by jointly analyzing single LRU caching and pending interest table (PIT) that contain object requests that are not yet fetched. The authors of [28] consider the object download delay and propose an algorithm based on q-LRU to optimize the average latency based on the popularity of the object and its size.…”
Section: Analysis Of Ttl Cache Hierarchiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recall that this assumption has been shown to produce significant errors (even in the zero object fetch delay regime) [7]. Further work that considers the download delay time for objects in single LRU caches includes [26,27], where the authors propose variants of the LRU algorithm that work better under non-zero delay by jointly analyzing single LRU caching and pending interest table (PIT) that contain object requests that are not yet fetched. The authors of [28] consider the object download delay and propose an algorithm based on q-LRU to optimize the average latency based on the popularity of the object and its size.…”
Section: Analysis Of Ttl Cache Hierarchiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How our contributions differ from [7,10,[26][27][28]: While [10] analyzes cache hierarchies under non-zero object fetch delays using approximations, our work differs significantly as we exactly analyze the caching hierarchies under non-zero delay. In Sect.5 and in the evaluations in Sect.…”
Section: Analysis Of Ttl Cache Hierarchiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, the realistic scenarios with request aggregation have been considered. It has been theoretically proved that the random process of the request arrival distribution and the content arrival distribution became different due to the request aggregation mechanism [20], [21]. The cache hit rate, average response time of requests and the cache space size distribution occupied by the pending interest table (PIT) were analyzed by using the cache strategy with fixed content sojourn time [30].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their formulated optimization problems are able to approximate to the actual system performances with low content request intensity. However, in the scenarios of massive content requests, the performances become distinctive due to the inherent request aggregation mechanism in CCN [20], [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%