2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.62.064303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of survival probability of superheavy nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

6
65
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
65
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively large reported production cross section, 5 pb, is typical of the higher cross sections associated with hot fusion reactions compared to cold fusion reactions (Figure 1) for the synthesis of Z > 112. It is these same cross sections, which challenge our understanding because current theoretical predictions of the survival probabilities in these reactions [12] would not give cross sections of this magnitude. For example, Armbruster [13] using the best available data on the capture cross sections, the probability of evolving from the contact configuration to the completely fused system and the survival probabilities, estimated a evaporation residue production section for the reaction of 231 MeV 48 Ca + 238 U → 286 112 → 283 112 + 3n of 50 fb.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The relatively large reported production cross section, 5 pb, is typical of the higher cross sections associated with hot fusion reactions compared to cold fusion reactions (Figure 1) for the synthesis of Z > 112. It is these same cross sections, which challenge our understanding because current theoretical predictions of the survival probabilities in these reactions [12] would not give cross sections of this magnitude. For example, Armbruster [13] using the best available data on the capture cross sections, the probability of evolving from the contact configuration to the completely fused system and the survival probabilities, estimated a evaporation residue production section for the reaction of 231 MeV 48 Ca + 238 U → 286 112 → 283 112 + 3n of 50 fb.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The yield of ERs is then determined by the probability W sur of surviving statistical fission decay from the compact configuration. Conceptually the ER cross section may therefore be written [6] ER cap P CN W sur ;…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The yield of ERs is then determined by the probability W sur of surviving statistical fission decay from the compact configuration. Conceptually the ER cross section may therefore be written [6] ER cap P CN W sur ;(1)here P CN and W sur are weighted averages over the low angular momenta leading to ER formation. Capture may well be described adequately in the coupled-channels framework, which has been successful in describing the fusion of lighter systems [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Should element 118 be synthesized, it will be interesting to compare these predictions with the observations. In a similar vein, there have been a number of papers [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37] dealing with the synthesis of element 118 and the reported production cross section, which was unexpectedly large. Special mention should be made of the work of Smolańczuk [23,30] which prompted the experimental measurement [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%