2017
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of survival in breast cancer patients by using different parametric models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e standard Weibull model was fitted first and denoted as Model 1. Random terms were added to capture variation at the regional level (Model 2), and extent was captured as Model 3. e decision to use the Weibull regression model was premise on the bases of previous knowledge on the distribution of breast cancer deaths [9]. e Weibull model [10] is a well-established model appropriate for modelling hazards that are either monotonically decreasing or increasing [11].…”
Section: Statistical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e standard Weibull model was fitted first and denoted as Model 1. Random terms were added to capture variation at the regional level (Model 2), and extent was captured as Model 3. e decision to use the Weibull regression model was premise on the bases of previous knowledge on the distribution of breast cancer deaths [9]. e Weibull model [10] is a well-established model appropriate for modelling hazards that are either monotonically decreasing or increasing [11].…”
Section: Statistical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e Weibull model [10] is a well-established model appropriate for modelling hazards that are either monotonically decreasing or increasing [11]. Application of parametric survival models to model breast cancer has been carried out [9,12] and elaborated on the advantages of using this model to account for censoring in data from administrative and historical databases [11]. Based on the model formulated by Nasejje et al [13], which was parameterized from Martino et al [14], we utilized the proportional hazards model of the form:…”
Section: Statistical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%