2015 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshop 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ipdpsw.2015.87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Subgraph-Centric Distributed Shortest Path Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work extends our previous work [8] that was limited to examining the BFS algorithm for three smaller graphs using a single partitioning strategy. Here, we generalize that approach by formally introducing the meta-graph sketch, exploring three different partitioning strategies, include PageRank in the algorithmic analysis, and validate these results for 5 large graphs with spatial and powerlaw topologies.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This work extends our previous work [8] that was limited to examining the BFS algorithm for three smaller graphs using a single partitioning strategy. Here, we generalize that approach by formally introducing the meta-graph sketch, exploring three different partitioning strategies, include PageRank in the algorithmic analysis, and validate these results for 5 large graphs with spatial and powerlaw topologies.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This is apparent, since visiting one vertex in each meta-vertex will require a traversal on a meta-edge, and the fewest possible such meta-edges is given by the radius, while the upper bound on the radius is the diameter. However, BFS using the subgraph centric model can have revisits [8], where the shortest path between two vertices in the same subgraph is through a different subgraph. As a result, a loose upper bound for the number of supersteps is the diameter of the whole graph.…”
Section: ) Number Of Superstepsmentioning
confidence: 99%