Analysis of Statistical Methods and Errors in the Articles Published in the Korean Journal of Pain

Abstract

BackgroundStatistical analysis is essential in regard to obtaining objective reliability for medical research. However, medical researchers do not have enough statistical knowledge to properly analyze their study data. To help understand and potentially alleviate this problem, we have analyzed the statistical methods and errors of articles published in the Korean Journal of Pain (KJP), with the intention to improve the statistical quality of the journal.MethodsAll the articles, except case reports and editorials, published from 2004 to 2008 in the KJP were reviewed. The types of applied statistical methods and errors in the articles were evaluated.ResultsOne hundred and thirty-nine original articles were reviewed. Inferential statistics and descriptive statistics were used in 119 papers and 20 papers, respectively. Only 20.9% of the papers were free from statistical errors. The most commonly adopted statistical method was the t-test (21.0%) followed by the chi-square test (15.9%). Errors of omission were encountered 101 times in 70 papers. Among the errors of omission, "no statistics used even though statistical methods were required" was the most common (40.6%). The errors of commission were encountered 165 times in 86 papers, among which "parametric inference for nonparametric data" was the most common (33.9%).ConclusionsWe found various types of statistical errors in the articles published in the KJP. This suggests that meticulous attention should be given not only in the applying statistical procedures but also in the reviewing process to improve the value of the article.

Statistics: From arbitrary to accurate reporting is the need of the hour: Results of a preliminary study

“…Many studies [5][6][7][8][9] including the present one have been found to have many lacunae in reporting statistics in biomedical literature. Studies have shown that only around 40% of the dental journals are noncompliant with regard to instructions regarding the data management/statistical analysis.…”

“…We found poor reporting corroborating many other studies in the biomedical literature. [4][5][6][7][8][9] Only 1 out of 55 articles has mentioned that a priori sample size calculation has been performed. Sample size has to be appropriate and essentially should be calculated before the start of the study so that the result of the study is credible.…”

“…Furthermore, only a few journals have statistical experts on their editorial board. [3] Hence, statistical flaws have been detected in many biomedical journals [4][5][6][7][8][9] including those published in the field of animal research [10] and ranges 30-90%. Although, studies have been conducted to evaluate the quality of randomized controlled studies in dentistry, [11,12] there was none pertaining to the quality of reporting statistics in particular.…”

Hostage of the Software: Experiences in Teaching Inferential Statistics to Undergraduate Human-Computer Interaction Students and a Survey of the Literature

“…The many questions posted on various discussion groups are testaments to this challenge. It has also been found that many scientific papers incorrectly report parametric tests when the data suggest non-parametric tests [96].…”

Thyroid Nodule Recognition Based on Feature Selection and Pixel Classification Methods

“…In the medical research domain, statistical analysis is an important tool to evaluate the medical significance of the outcome of various processing techniques [19]. Theoretically, a complete study of feature selection should be imposed to examine all 2 N different combinations of characteristic features (here N is the number of characteristic features).…”