2019
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines7010024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of State-Specific Differences in Childhood Vaccination Coverage in Rural India

Abstract: There is little research on state-level differences in child health outcomes in India. The aim of this study was to identify state-level characteristics that relate to childhood immunizations. Most state-level characteristics came from the 2011 Indian Census. Individual-level data and other state-level characteristics were obtained from the 2007–2008 District Level Household and Facility Survey. Predictors of full vaccination were assessed with logistic regression models. Among 86,882 children 12–36 months, 53… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important consideration is how the relationship of socioeconomic status (SES) varies with vaccine hesitancy, and whether this is context-specific. Low vaccine uptake in LMICs has mostly been associated with individuals of lower SES [17][18][19][20][21], although this has been tied to disparities in access, affordability, and awareness, and less so on acceptance or hesitancy [22,23]. In contrast, more affluent individuals in high-income countries appear to be more vaccine hesitant and may have lower vaccine uptake [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important consideration is how the relationship of socioeconomic status (SES) varies with vaccine hesitancy, and whether this is context-specific. Low vaccine uptake in LMICs has mostly been associated with individuals of lower SES [17][18][19][20][21], although this has been tied to disparities in access, affordability, and awareness, and less so on acceptance or hesitancy [22,23]. In contrast, more affluent individuals in high-income countries appear to be more vaccine hesitant and may have lower vaccine uptake [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 22 23 ] It must be emphasized that improving access to Primary Health Centres could help address inequities in vaccination coverage in areas characterized by lower levels of maternal education. [ 24 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is compounded by the lack of awareness among these populations about the measures needed to promote positive health. [ 24 ] This invites the prompt mobilization of healthcare outreach by healthcare functionary and strong political commitment toward rural infrastructure development. [ 9 28 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is estimated that among the 19.5 million children worldwide who did not receive all basic vaccines in the first year of life in 2016, 16% were from India [18]. India has achieved considerable improvements in child vaccination coverage; however, significant challenges to closing the immunization gap remain, especially those related to beneficiary demand for immunization [19].…”
Section: Context Of the Tika Vaani Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…India has achieved considerable improvements in child vaccination coverage; however, significant challenges to closing the immunization gap remain, especially those related to beneficiary demand for immunization [19]. Sociodemographic factors, levels of knowledge, and public beliefs may affect vaccination coverage in children [18,19]. Educational approaches targeting the general population and adapted to local beliefs are necessary to address these barriers [19].…”
Section: Context Of the Tika Vaani Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%