2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2005.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of stabilization operators for Galerkin least-squares discretizations of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since it belongs to unified scheme category, the main advantage of stabilized finite element method is its capability to solve both compressible and incompressible Navier-Stokes equations (15) in the same formalism [15,16,29,30]. That is to say: the same mesh, the same unknowns, the same approximation spaces and the same finite element formulation.…”
Section: Gls Finite Element Methods For Unified Equationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Since it belongs to unified scheme category, the main advantage of stabilized finite element method is its capability to solve both compressible and incompressible Navier-Stokes equations (15) in the same formalism [15,16,29,30]. That is to say: the same mesh, the same unknowns, the same approximation spaces and the same finite element formulation.…”
Section: Gls Finite Element Methods For Unified Equationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover the density has its material derivative equal to zero and is only a function of the initial state (constant along characteristics). This is also equivalent to use a p and b T as small parameters to derive the incompressible model [15,16,29,30]. Within this context, it has been shown that the matrices for incompressible formulation A I i are the same as the one for weakly compressible model A C i where v is set to zero [15,16] i.e.…”
Section: Navier-stokes Equations Unified Formmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations