2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.01.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Spontaneous Gene Conversion Tracts within and between Mammalian Chromosomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the four data sets of yeast, the estimates are within a quite small range from ∼50 to several hundred bp, which seems to be much smaller than allelic gene conversion [73]. The results for rodents are similar; our estimates are around 100 bp except for the data of Rukść et al [72], which provide an estimate of >1 kb with a much wider confidence interval (roughly 1 kp) than the others. This may be partly because the marker density is very low (the average interval is 375 bp for this data set, while the average of the others is ∼160 bp).…”
Section: The Tract Length Of Gene Conversionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…For the four data sets of yeast, the estimates are within a quite small range from ∼50 to several hundred bp, which seems to be much smaller than allelic gene conversion [73]. The results for rodents are similar; our estimates are around 100 bp except for the data of Rukść et al [72], which provide an estimate of >1 kb with a much wider confidence interval (roughly 1 kp) than the others. This may be partly because the marker density is very low (the average interval is 375 bp for this data set, while the average of the others is ∼160 bp).…”
Section: The Tract Length Of Gene Conversionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…These studies indicated that the crossovers were more likely to occur near the initiation site of strand invasion, probably as a result of branch migration. Although similar studies have been undertaken in mammalian systems [10]–[13], [40], [48] the generality of the conclusions were restricted by the limited scale of the data. Taking advantage of the high targeting efficiency of rAAV, we performed a SNP retention analysis for non-DSB (Figure 1E and F) and DSB-induced (Figure 5G and H) gene targeting in human cells with unprecedented resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of the robust competing pathway of DSBR known as non-homologous end joining [8], gene targeting events occur rarely in mammals [9][11]. Indeed, despite valiant efforts — in particular by the Baker laboratory [10], [12], [13] — the low targeting efficiency of plasmid-based dsDNA vectors has prohibited a systematic characterization of recombination intermediates in mammalian cells. To gain better insight into the mechanism of human gene targeting it is crucial to establish a more vigorous gene targeting system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In yeast, Drosophila and mouse, the majority of recombination‐associated crossovers exhibit continuous gene conversion associated with simple conversion tracts, where all sequence mismatches within a given tract have been converted from the same donor template (Fig. B) [Haber et al., ; Lee et al., ; Mancera et al., ; Pâques and Haber, ; Rukść et al., ; Weng et al., ]. Similarly in humans, most characterized AHR crossovers have been found to be associated with continuous gene conversion [Jeffreys et al., , , ; Jeffreys and Neumann, ; Webb et al., ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%